From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Background on the Michael-John Bolton affair
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 07:32:11 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> Interesting reading.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> " At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John
>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security
>>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
>>>>>> FBI emails. "
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
>>>>>> investigation
>>>>>
>>>>> And 4 year long investigation found...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...what?
>>>>
>>>> The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
>>>>
>>>> Duh.
>>>
>>> Of course!
>>>
>>> The deep state!
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>
>> CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
>> cited
>>
>> Dang dude...
>
>CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
>it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
about the deep state but you.