From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: More on Michael John Bolton's crimes
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:47:15 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-08-26 07:39, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:27:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-08-25 04:38, NoBody wrote:
>>> WASHINGTON â Former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton should
>>> face criminal charges over his alleged emailing of highly sensitive
>>> classified materials through a private server, high ranking FBI
>>> officials told The Post Saturday, as they questioned why the Biden
>>> administration shelved the case in the first place.
>>>
>>> Federal agents raided Boltonâs Maryland home and DC office Friday
>>> morning in search of evidence in their case investigating the Trump
>>> criticâs alleged theft of âhighly sensitive national security
>>> documents.â
>>>
>>> The alleged crime was first identified in 2020 through a âvery
>>> specific intelligence capacityâ that helped produce damning
>>> intelligence that Bolton had âtransferredâ classified documents to his
>>> wife and daughter from his White House desk before Trump fired him in
>>> September 2019, the senior sources told The Post.
>>>
>>> Investigators opened the case â entirely separate from a different
>>> investigation into Boltonâs alleged inclusion of national security
>>> secrets in his 2020 book, âThe Room Where it Happenedâ â at the time,
>>> which carried into the Biden administration, but was âshelved,â
>>> officials said.
>>>
>>> https://nypost.com/2025/08/23/us-news/fbi-believes-bolton-should-face-charges-over-alleged-emailed-classified-docs-to-family-and-questions-why-biden-shelved-case/
>>
>> Riiiiiiight.
>>
>> An anonymous source in Trump's highly politicized FBI...
>
> Laughter!
>
> Suddenly you're concerned about anonymous sources when nearly every
> story is written around "sources".
>
> Interesting.
You and your ilk have been the ones complaining about sources in the
past, doofus. You can't now turn around and say they're credible just
because you like what you're reading.
And don't even try to pretend that Trump is politicizing government
agencies.