From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: NY appeals court slaps Judge Engoron hard
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:48:08 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-08-26 07:29, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:53 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-08-25 04:29, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:36 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-08-24 07:23, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:34:06 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-08-23 11:18, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> "In New York, a court revealed that a leading citizen had cooked the
>>>>>>> books by inflating questionable figures without any support in
>>>>>>> reality. Moreover, his wild overvaluation was widely viewed as
>>>>>>> motivated by his self-aggrandizement. The final reported figures are
>>>>>>> so absurdly inflated that they were rejected in their entirety. In the
>>>>>>> end, he was off by over half a billion dollars.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That man is Judge Arthur Engoron.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After a New York appellate court unanimously threw out Engoron's
>>>>>>> absurd half-a-billion-dollar judgment and interest against President
>>>>>>> Donald Trump, the irony was crushing. It was Engoron who seemed, as he
>>>>>>> characterized Trump witnesses, as having "simply denied reality." It
>>>>>>> made his notorious reliance on an assessment of Mar-a-Lago as worth
>>>>>>> between $18 million and $27.6 million seem like good accounting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the end, he could not get a single judge to preserve a single
>>>>>>> dollar of that fine.
>>>>>> Did they overturn the verdict?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Didn't expect that they would because it's New York. That will get
>>>>> addressed in future appeals.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your running away from the post is noted.
>>>>
>>>> It was a New York appellate court that threw out the award, doofus.
>>>
>>> Which is in......New York.
>>>
>>> <eyeroll>
>>
>> Which YOU said was the reason the verdict wasn't overturned...
>>
>> ...so why the contradiction?
>
> No contradiction at all. The award was SO outrageous that even a
> liberal New York appeals court couldn't not toss it. The verdict
> itself falls within their level of "acceptable" corruption. Look for
> that to be overturned in another court at some point.
Riiiiiiiiight.
How about, Trump did the things with which he was charged, which was
proven beyond a reasonable doubt?