From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: NY appeals court slaps Judge Engoron hard
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 07:20:36 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:48:08 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-08-26 07:29, NoBody wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:53 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-08-25 04:29, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:36 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-08-24 07:23, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:34:06 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-08-23 11:18, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> "In New York, a court revealed that a leading citizen had cooked the
>>>>>>>> books by inflating questionable figures without any support in
>>>>>>>> reality. Moreover, his wild overvaluation was widely viewed as
>>>>>>>> motivated by his self-aggrandizement. The final reported figures are
>>>>>>>> so absurdly inflated that they were rejected in their entirety. In the
>>>>>>>> end, he was off by over half a billion dollars.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That man is Judge Arthur Engoron.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After a New York appellate court unanimously threw out Engoron's
>>>>>>>> absurd half-a-billion-dollar judgment and interest against President
>>>>>>>> Donald Trump, the irony was crushing. It was Engoron who seemed, as he
>>>>>>>> characterized Trump witnesses, as having "simply denied reality." It
>>>>>>>> made his notorious reliance on an assessment of Mar-a-Lago as worth
>>>>>>>> between $18 million and $27.6 million seem like good accounting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the end, he could not get a single judge to preserve a single
>>>>>>>> dollar of that fine.
>>>>>>> Did they overturn the verdict?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Didn't expect that they would because it's New York. That will get
>>>>>> addressed in future appeals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your running away from the post is noted.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a New York appellate court that threw out the award, doofus.
>>>>
>>>> Which is in......New York.
>>>>
>>>> <eyeroll>
>>>
>>> Which YOU said was the reason the verdict wasn't overturned...
>>>
>>> ...so why the contradiction?
>>
>> No contradiction at all. The award was SO outrageous that even a
>> liberal New York appeals court couldn't not toss it. The verdict
>> itself falls within their level of "acceptable" corruption. Look for
>> that to be overturned in another court at some point.
>
>Riiiiiiiiight.
>
>How about, Trump did the things with which he was charged, which was
>proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
Tell us who the victim was. Oh, and it was a civil trial not a
criminal trial where the standard is much lower. If you can't get the
basics correct, how am I supposed to take anything you write
seriously?