From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: More on Michael John Bolton's crimes
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 07:31:59 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:47:15 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-08-26 07:39, NoBody wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:27:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-08-25 04:38, NoBody wrote:
>>>> WASHINGTON Former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton should
>>>> face criminal charges over his alleged emailing of highly sensitive
>>>> classified materials through a private server, high ranking FBI
>>>> officials told The Post Saturday, as they questioned why the Biden
>>>> administration shelved the case in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> Federal agents raided Boltons Maryland home and DC office Friday
>>>> morning in search of evidence in their case investigating the Trump
>>>> critics alleged theft of highly sensitive national security
>>>> documents.
>>>>
>>>> The alleged crime was first identified in 2020 through a very
>>>> specific intelligence capacity that helped produce damning
>>>> intelligence that Bolton had transferred classified documents to his
>>>> wife and daughter from his White House desk before Trump fired him in
>>>> September 2019, the senior sources told The Post.
>>>>
>>>> Investigators opened the case entirely separate from a different
>>>> investigation into Boltons alleged inclusion of national security
>>>> secrets in his 2020 book, The Room Where it Happened at the time,
>>>> which carried into the Biden administration, but was shelved,
>>>> officials said.
>>>>
>>>> https://nypost.com/2025/08/23/us-news/fbi-believes-bolton-should-face-charges-over-alleged-emailed-classified-docs-to-family-and-questions-why-biden-shelved-case/
>>>
>>> Riiiiiiight.
>>>
>>> An anonymous source in Trump's highly politicized FBI...
>>
>> Laughter!
>>
>> Suddenly you're concerned about anonymous sources when nearly every
>> story is written around "sources".
>>
>> Interesting.
>
>You and your ilk have been the ones complaining about sources in the
>past, doofus. You can't now turn around and say they're credible just
>because you like what you're reading.
Did I say I accept them at face value?
Nope.
But I've demonstrated your doublestandards.
>
>And don't even try to pretend that Trump is politicizing government
>agencies.
That's a no duh as government agencies are ALWAYS politicized. How
amusing that you suddenly notice and complain about this.