From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: NBC News Reports That Unless We Stop Burning Ancient Carbon, We Will Face Catastrophic Global Warming Within The Next Ten Years
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 19:30:26 -0400
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 22:06:59 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
>On 2025-08-27, Governor Swill wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 pothead wrote:
>>>On 2025-08-26, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 -hh wrote:
>>>>>On 8/25/25 21:51, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 15:07:04 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>> When has the climate last changed THIS fast, before?
>>>>>> I count about 21 times, JUST in the last 10,000 years.
>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/CtoUg4n.jpg
>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/y7fX6aC.jpg
>>>>>Better look at that again, Phil, for *rate*.
>>>> Not to mention these are screen caps posted to imgur. There is no
>>>> context for them and no guarantee they haven't been doctored. Alleycat
>>>> has been caught faking and manipulating data before.
>>>So all of a sudden screen caps are valid but when it comes to screen shots regarding
>>>snit's criminal escapades, and by multiple people they are all of a sudden deemed invalid.
>>>You need to make up your mind. You can't have it both ways.
Why are you putting words in my mouth? I just finished saying 'cat's
screenshots are *NOT* valid.
>> You've never shown any such screen shots. Text copy/pastes of text
>> others typed aren't screen shots of original data.
>
>I've reposted screenshots from other people.
... of their text posted to Usenet. No actual screenshots of the data
source have been posted, the excuse being the data is no longer
available. Hmmm...
>I don't believe in doxxing
Yet you have posted Snit's real name and location in afr-l on multiple
occasions. Hmmm...
>and wouldn't waste a dime looking up snit personal information
Which you don't have to do because others have given you that
information.
> even though he is a lying SOB.
So are you and most of the rest of Usenet. What's your point?
>> It's especially convenient that the 'original source' of that data is
>> no longer available.
>
>No it's not.
>State courts all have their own and usually different retention policies especially
>when it comes to the public websites.
>And just because a case is on the official site today, if a plea bargain or other
>deal with the prosecutor is reached, including charges dropped if the defendant
>behaves for a period of time, the listing is removed.
>And that is only fair.
>
>The only convenient part is that snit can use it as an excuse even though he knows
>full well what happened and that completely unrelated people did take screenshots before
>some cases were removed.
Then where are those screenshots?
>Truthfully TBH, if you support snit you are a fool because at some point he will
>toss you under the bus just like he does with everyone.
When that happens I'll deal with it. You know how? I'll simply
ignore him.
>You are dealing with a very sick person here.
Snit or you?
>At some point you will find out for yourself.
>We all have,
But you are the obsessed one that cannot let a day go by without
posting about Snit. Show us on the doll where the bad man hurt you.
I challenge you not to post about Snit, reply to Snit or reply to any
post about Snit for one month.
You can't do it. Today is the 27th.
--
I do not think that horse is completely dead yet.
Whip it some more. - Siri Cruz