From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics
Subject: Re: More on Michael John Bolton's crimes
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:18:19 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 07:31:59 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:47:15 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2025-08-26 07:39, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:27:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-08-25 04:38, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> WASHINGTON Former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton should
>>>>> face criminal charges over his alleged emailing of highly sensitive
>>>>> classified materials through a private server, high ranking FBI
>>>>> officials told The Post Saturday, as they questioned why the Biden
>>>>> administration shelved the case in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Federal agents raided Boltons Maryland home and DC office Friday
>>>>> morning in search of evidence in their case investigating the Trump
>>>>> critics alleged theft of highly sensitive national security
>>>>> documents.
>>>>>
>>>>> The alleged crime was first identified in 2020 through a very
>>>>> specific intelligence capacity that helped produce damning
>>>>> intelligence that Bolton had transferred classified documents to his
>>>>> wife and daughter from his White House desk before Trump fired him in
>>>>> September 2019, the senior sources told The Post.
>>>>>
>>>>> Investigators opened the case entirely separate from a different
>>>>> investigation into Boltons alleged inclusion of national security
>>>>> secrets in his 2020 book, The Room Where it Happened at the time,
>>>>> which carried into the Biden administration, but was shelved,
>>>>> officials said.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://nypost.com/2025/08/23/us-news/fbi-believes-bolton-should-face-charges-over-alleged-emailed-classified-docs-to-family-and-questions-why-biden-shelved-case/
>>>>
>>>> Riiiiiiight.
>>>>
>>>> An anonymous source in Trump's highly politicized FBI...
>>>
>>> Laughter!
>>>
>>> Suddenly you're concerned about anonymous sources when nearly every
>>> story is written around "sources".
>>>
>>> Interesting.
>>
>>You and your ilk have been the ones complaining about sources in the
>>past, doofus. You can't now turn around and say they're credible just
>>because you like what you're reading.
>
>Did I say I accept them at face value?
>Nope.
>But I've demonstrated your doublestandards.
>
>>
>>And don't even try to pretend that Trump is politicizing government
>>agencies.
>
>That's a no duh as government agencies are ALWAYS politicized. How
>amusing that you suddenly notice and complain about this.
<crickets.wav>