Davin News Server

On Sun, 31 Aug 2025 22:39:58 -0400,  Alan says...  

> > That doesn't matter at all. He had it and was going to put it in a
> > fucking book, for all to read. And, let's not forget about his 
> > private email server and sending CLASSIFIED information to
> > RELATIVES.
> 
> No. He wrote a manuscript and sent it to the proper people to determine 
> what was classified and what was not:

And then, off to the publishers, after a re-write, of course.

Keep playing your bullshit faggot semantics, faggot.
 
> You've yet to produce any evidence at all of a "private email server"; 
> let alone that it was used to send classified information to anyone.

So? It's not my J O B to prove ANYTHING to ANYONE, especially to a narcissistic little shit like you, when you or anyone else can 
look it up your damn selves.

It was in all the papers and websites.

Look it up yourself. Do you need me to provide you with keywords, so you can look it up... again? (LOL)

It's on the Internet and judging by the way you asked for proof, again... I suspect you DID look it up and found out EXACTLY what 
I'm talking about and you have ZERO refutations or rebuttals, but want to carry this on as long as you can, to make you feel better 
about yourself.

NOT going to play your "I'm a superior faggot troll" game, faggot.

You DO win there, rich boy, as I am 0% faggot, whereas you...
 
> > 
> > You have GOT to stop whining and crying about everything Trump. This
> > has NOTHING to DO with Trump. If anything, it's all about Biden.
> > 
> >> What it DOES say is that Knight and her team reviewed the
> >> manuscript BEFORE it was sent to the publishers.
> > 
> > Again... what does THAT matter? It WAS being attempted to go to a
> > publisher.
> 
> Nope. It was submitted to the appropriate government office for clearance.

And then, off to the publishers, after a re-write, of course.

So... your claim, is that it was going to the "censors" only.

Gotcha.

Keep playing your bullshit faggot semantics, faggot.

> > Ever heard of Conspiracy? Whether the manuscript made it to the
> > publisher or not, is moot. It was an attempt BY Bolton, to GET it 
> > there.
> > 
> > What about emailed classified docs to family?
> > 
> > WASHINGTON - Former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton
> > should face criminal charges over his alleged emailing of highly 
> > sensitive classified materials through a private server, high
> > ranking FBI officials told The Post Saturday, as they questioned why 
> > the Biden administration shelved the case in the first place.
> 
> Anonymous voices in Trump's administration talking to the NY Post.

https://i.imgur.com/yXzkcH7.mp4

> <eye roll>

<eye roll, indeed>

That's rich, coming from the side that cheers on The Washington Post and The New York Times for using anonymous sources, and 
NOTHING ever coming of their stories. In other words, always debunked, or go NO where.
 
> > 
> > That, alone, should garner jail time for Bolton, and whomever
> > dropped the ball in the Biden administration.
> 
> If it ever even happened.

LOL... looked it up already, huh faggot? You always act like something never happened or doesn't exist, because you looked them up 
and have ZERO refutations for me. You don't CARE whether they're true or not... you just NEED to play your bullshit liberal faggot 
games.

You like me too much, weirdo.

If you truly thought I was lying and THAT'S what you're arguing against, why aren't you replying to all those who REALLY lie, like 
Rudy?

He likes me... he really really likes me. For prurient reasons, indeed.

No thanks... I'm taken. 
 
> > WHY are you trying to defend Bolton? He's a war-mongering social
> > conservative, who was probably trying to nail BIDEN to the wall, re:
> > Ukraine.
> 
> Because unlike you, I don't pick and choose what is true or false based 
> on my political biases.

https://i.imgur.com/yXzkcH7.mp4


 
> 'The review started with Ambassador Bolton's submission of the 
> manuscript on December 30, 2019.'

And it was going to a publisher after that.

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."