From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump
Subject: Re: Background on the Michael-John Bolton affair
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 10:25:19 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 14:14:33 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-09-01 09:18, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2025 22:35:57 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-08-31 09:59, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 12:46:46 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-08-28 07:14, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting reading.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> " At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And 4 year long investigation found...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The deep state!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
>>>>>>>>>>>> cited
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dang dude...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
>>>>>>>>>>> it, does it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
>>>>>>>>>> about the deep state but you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as
>>>>>>>>> if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In your dreams.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was
>>>>>>>> shut down that June for political reasons, a senior US official told
>>>>>>>> The Post Friday."
>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you choose a more biased source?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden
>>>>>> administration???
>>>>
>>>> Silence (of course).
>>>
>>> Because it's moot.
>>
>> Good grief. And you still barely acknowledge the fact of the matter.
>
>It's a fact that the investigation was dropped.
About time...
>
>It is not a fact that it was dropped for any improper reason.
Laughter!
>
>>
>>>
>>> Do you suppose they could have dropped the investigation because there
>>> was nothing there to find?
>>
>> Laughter!
>> You're more than welcome to cite your theory.
>
>That IS my theory, and you have nothing that contradicts it.
>
And you're welcome to cite it. Until then it's wild speculation on
your part.
>>
>>>
>>> After all, it's not like Bolton was a friend to Biden's administration,
>>> now was it?
>>>
>>
>> You were whining previously about "the deep state"...
>
>No, you'll find I was making fun of those who claim there is a "deep state".
Well since I don't take part in that, why did you feel the need to
bring it up?
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest
>>>>>>> of Trump?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also
>>>>>>> set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal
>>>>>>> judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump
>>>>>>> White House to falsely declare The Room Where It Happened contained
>>>>>>> classified information.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So?
>>>>
>>>> Silence (of course).
>>>
>>> So you don't think there's a problem with someone being pressured by the
>>> Trump's administration to declare something she knows to be false, and
>>> that the administration fired her for that?
>>
>> You are welcome to present evidence that her claim is true.
>
>You are welcome to present any evidence that it isn't.
>
Laughter!
It was her affirmative claim.
>She was writing to a judge in a legal proceeding and that is more than
>your anonymous sources, isn't it?
Two different subjects that you're trying to mesh together.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Knight has been in your federal government since 2011, and was promoted
>>> to the position first the position of Director and then Senior Director
>>> of the National Security Council...
>>>
>>> ...BY DONALD TRUMP.
>>>
>>
>> So?
Silence.
>>
>>> And then she won't say what he wants her to say and she's suddenly fired.
>>
>> Laughter!
>
>It's what happened.
So she says. In any case, if you don't follow your boss's direction,
you're likely to not have a job for very long so I don't see your
point.