From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism
Subject: Re: Illinois governer rebuffs federal intervention to prevent Chicago murders - does nothing instead
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 22:53:58 -0400
On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 00:26:25 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>On 2025-09-04, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2025 19:56:39 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 2025-09-02 07:40, NoBody wrote:
<snip>
>>>> The politicians want their communities to be hellholes. It's the only
>>>> possible answer.
>>>So if Trump is applying resources in places where the problem ISN'T worst...
>>>...does he want those communities where it IS worst to be hellholes?
>>
>> This is your standard go to, run away response.
>> Stick to the topic of Chicago and the politicians' refusal to enforce
>> laws please.
>
>This is classic libby OLAS.
>OLAS = Oh Look A Squirrel.
Your deluding yourself. It's an entirely logical point. If the goal
is to reduce crime, go where the crime is, not where the cameras are.
When you have an ear infection, does the doctor treat your foot?
>They see trump actually trying to do something about the massive crime problems
We see no such thing. We see him grandstanding and throwing his
weight around just so he can prove he's the big cheese.
>affecting some democrat run cities and they have to attack him instead
>of support the people.
Trump isn't doing anything about crime. If he was, he'd be doing
something in high crime areas. As has been proven to you time and
time again, DC is hardly the den of thieves you would pretend. Neither
is NYC or Chicago. You want high crime? Go to Ohio, Missouri or
Louisiana. Those three states have nine towns on your top 25 most
dangerous list. Also on the most dangerous list is a beach town in
South Carolina of fewer than 25k people. That's not a city but it is
the 13th most dangerous place in the US according to YOU.
>As I have said before, Trump snookered the democrats.
>If they had brains, which most do not, they could have shut Trump down by simply
>thanking him, working with him and once his work is done in a particular locale, ask
>for additional funding to support the police.
If Trump were genuinely interested in cutting crime, that might have
happened. Too bad the GOP has repeatedly cut crime fighting funding
over the past few years.
>Bowser, to her credit, reacted in that manner.
Despite your nasty nym for her, the mayor of DC is doing what the
Presidents and Prime Ministers of Europe have learned to do; what Xi
and Modi and Putin have learned to do: smile and be sweet and tell him
how great he is to his face. But when he turns his back, do whatever
you *really* want.
>Libbys are alright when FEMA slow tracks aid to homes displaying Trump support signs.
Why do you tell such lies? Why do you accept without question every
line of right wing extremist propaganda you see?
>Or when the IRS targets conservatives.
Same.
--
It's easier to fool a man than convince him he's been fooled.
-- attributed to Mark Twain
8647!