From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Soooo Ignorant! Re: Soooo Efficient!
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 10:13:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-09-06 07:14, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 12:53:35 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2025-09-04 21:19, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:22:01 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-09-01 21:14, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>> A two-megawatt windmill is made up of 260 tons of steel that required 300 tons of iron ore and 170 tons of coking coal, all mined,
>>>>> transported and produced by hydrocarbons.
>>>>>
>>>>> They each consume 10'000 liters (more than 2600 gallons) of crude oil based lubricants per year.
>>>>
>>>> 'How much lubricant does a 2 MW wind turbine use in a year?
>>>>
>>>> A typical 2 MW wind turbine uses approximately 80 gallons (about 300
>>>> liters) of lubricating oil per year for maintenance and operational
>>>> efficiency. This figure includes oil used in the gearbox, yaw and pitch
>>>> systems, braking systems, and other components requiring lubrication.'
>>>>
>>>> So you were only wrong by a factor of 33, Loser!
>>>
>>> *I* wasn't wrong.
>>
>> You posted it here, Loser.
>
> So... if you post a statement by Trump and it's a lie, YOU lied?
Only if I post it claiming it was true.
>
> LOL... you REALLY are bad at this.
>
>>> https://x.com/search?q=%22more%20than%202600%20gallons%22&src=typed_query
>>>
>>> When you faggots on the left post a lamestream media article which turns out to be wrong, are YOU wrong?
>
> Rationalizations are ignored and deleted.
You mean you're too much of a little pussy to address them.
If I repost an article as truth and it turns out to be wrong, then so
was I. I wasn't lying, you understand; just wrong.
>
>>>
>>> A "lie" is something you tell on purpose. If you repeat someone else's words?
>>
>> And look at the goal post shift!
>
> Coming from the Queen of shifting, I'll say that has no weight here.
>
>> I didn't say you lied, Loser...
>>
>> ...I sad you were WRONG, because:
>>
>> YOU WERE WRONG!
>
> Nope. We haven't established that the stats were in the same realm YOU were posting.
>
> YOU admitted the stats he used COULD have been of a different nature.
Really? How did I "admit" that? Quote it.