Davin News Server

On Sun, 7 Sep 2025 22:27:37 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote: 
>On 2025-09-07, Governor Swill  wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Sep 2025 14:37:16 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote: 
<snip>
>>>I'm surprised that Swill isn't interested in protecting the citizens rather than coddling the criminals.
>>
>> I'm surprised you're incapable of making a comment that's truly
>> relevant.
>>
>>>> Chicago is a Blue-run shithole.              
>>>
>>>Indeed it is.
>>
>> No, it isn't.  You denial that the problem exists in Republican
>> governance is certainly fascinating.
>
>Show me where I have specifically claimed the problem does not exist in
>Republican governance?

Every time crime is mentioned by you, you point at Democrat
administered jurisdictions so don't sit there spinning your own words
180 degrees from what they actually were.

>Interesting play on words after your Republican run state crime conflated
>with democrat run city crime argument failed.

Perhaps you should look up "conflated".  I do not think it means what
you think it means.  Red state crime is simply a fact and you hate it
because for you crime is not a problem to solve, it's a political
cudgel and the cudgel is in the other hand.  Just like immigration.

>I have clearly stated that this should be a non partisan issue 

Where?  When?  You've done nothing for months except link crime to
Democrats.  You can stop lying about it any time now.

>and places
>with crime out of control should allow the feds to come in

That's illegal.  Complaining about crime and then suggesting breaking
the law to resolve it.

When it was suggested to you by more than one poster here that, if
Trump is going to engage in local crime reduction he should focus on
the cities with the worst crime, you kept trying to push the focus
back onto Chicago, NYC and DC. 

That you would sit here in front of everybody who read your words and
try to deny you wrote them is laughable.  Everybody knows what you've
said before and it does NOT agree with what you're saying now.  You
are, without doubt, the most Orwellian poster here.

> and fix what
>the local government is incapable of fixing.
>That's MY opinion.

And your opinion, like so many pro Trump opinions, is to commit
illegal acts in the pursuit of your agenda.

>The left are the ones trying to turn it into a party issue and guess what?

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Say it again, that was funny!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!

More of the usual right wing bullshit. You turn the facts 180 degrees
and project your own behavior onto your opponents.  Get caught out of
touch with reality?  Just lie about what you've claimed reality is!

Again, that you would sit here and say this with your bare face
hanging out is laughable!

>The citizens of these places just want it fixed and if the party on power cannot
>then bring in an organization who can.

It isn't the business of the federal government to patrol, arrest or
prosecute local or state crimes.  It is ILLEGAL for them to do so and
I don't care if you like it or not.  The fact is, one crime doesn't
cancel out another.

<snip>

>> You still haven't answered the question, "Why is crime worse in blue
>> cities in red states than in blue cities in blue states?"
>
>Ahh, so now you finally bring cities into the discussion rather than your
>last tactic of conflating states with cities.

It's the same question I've been asking all along.  Nothing has
changed except your continued attempts to lie about the discussion.

>My answer is, each place has to be evaluated on it's own merit and crime is
>crime is crime and I doubt the people living in crime infested areas don't give
>a hoot about the why, they just want it fixed ASAP.

Uh-huh, says the moron who blames crime on Democrats but never, EVER
blames a Republican for ANYTHING.

You completely ignore the fact that crime is worse in high population
concentrations regardless of who is in charge.  It's true around the
world; crime in cities is always going to be worse.

But you still have not answered that question.

"Why is crime worse in blue cities in red states than in blue cities
in blue states?"

>Party doesn't matter, at least to the victims.

It matters to you.  You link crime to Democrats every time you post
about it.  I don't see you whining about murder rates in Republican
jurisdictions and you can't spin away fast enough from the fact that
crime tends to be worse in Republican governed states or the fact that
Louisiana and Ohio, both red states, have between them six of the top
25 crime infested cities based on a cite YOU provided but clearly did
not read.

"Why is crime worse in blue cities in red states than in blue cities
in blue states?"

>It's common sense.

When do you plan to apply common sense to this discussion?

>> Are you going to keep your tail between your legs forever?
>
>I don't have a tail.

It only looks that way because it's hiding between your legs.

>The type of person you are fantasizing about is called a "furry".
>You should be able to find one on a hook up site like Ferzu.com.
>And yes, I did duck duck that.
>
>Maybe Joel or snit can get you a discount.
>Both of them are into kink like that.
>ROTFLMAO

So, you've gone the whole post without answering the question you
noted above.  You've resorted instead to insults and name calling.

So,  "Why is crime worse in blue cities in red states than in blue
cities in blue states?" 

Are you going to stop running away from the question?
-- 
"Why is crime worse in blue cities in red states
 than it is in blue cities in blue states?"

8647!