Davin News Server

From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Trouble In Paradise
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:35:45 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 2025-09-09 15:21, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-09-09, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 16:40:42 -0700,  Alan says...
>>
>>>
>>> On 2025-09-08 06:09, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hillary Clinton:  Release the Epstein files!
>>>>
>>>> Bill Clinton:     Honey? What the fuck!!??
>>
>> Which explains why Obama/Biden and the Democrats were so desperate to keep them locked away...
>>
>> ... exactly.
>>
>> If Trump was involved as much as you Drag-Queen-loving liberals HOPE he is, the Democrats would have leaked the information when
>> they had the files for 4+ years.
>>
>> Check the time lines, stupid.
>>
>> Trump had a falling out with Epstein... remember?
>>
>> There is no law that says Republicans can't protect Democrats, and vice versa, if the consequences are too dire.
>>
>> Trump's not the one being protected.
> 
> It's logic and common sense. Two traits the left do not posess.
> 
> If Trump was directly implicated in the files, as in spending time with underage or trafficked,
> threatened girls of any age, the democrats would have been all over it.

The files were sealed by the courts at the time they had the power...

...you forget that after the 2018 midterms, the Democrats no longer 
controlled the House.

> 
> Why go though all of the trouble and risk of suddenly bringing all types of lawfare
> against Trump when releasing the files implicating him as a pedo, sicko would have sunk
> his political career faster than the Lusitania?
> 
> This only makes sense to the left who are clinging to their final attack on Trump.
> 
> At least to me, BOTH sides are trying to protect very famous and powerful people.
> That's the only logical explanation although I suspect Clinton is all over the list.
So lacking evidence you believe "Clinton is all over the list"...

...but somehow the accruing evidence of Trump's involvement is proof to 
you he isn't all over it?