Davin News Server

From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: All The Democrats Ever Do Is Cheat - This Is Getting Old
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 20:32:57 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.


On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:19:12 -0700,  Alan says...  

> 
> On 2025-09-09 18:13, AlleyCat wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:01:22 -0700,  Alan says...
> > 
> >>> Prove they're eligible or...
> > 
> >> Just read my other reply, Loser.
> > 
> > And it also says they're adding INACTIVE voters, which will lend itself to fraud.
> > 
> > Never heard of that, have you.
> > 
> > "Vote twice... it's nice."
> I told you read and reply to my other post.

Voters who are inactive may not vote again, lending itself to voter fraud.

Dead voters tell no tales, right?

Wrong.

Do you REALLY think Broward County went out and took a head count f inactive voters?

Activating DEAD people IS illegal.

OK... now, rationalize that. Not a single dead person in that "inactive" voter roll?

Doubtful.

There HAVE been instances where deceased individuals have been registered to vote or had their names used to cast votes.

In the United States, for example, there have been various studies and investigations into the phenomenon of "voter fraud," which 
includes instances of deceased individuals voting.

Some notable cases of deceased individuals voting include:

In 2012, a study by the nonpartisan group Election Integrity Coalition found that over 1,000 deceased individuals had voted in the 
2008 presidential election in the state of Ohio.

In 2019, a report by the North Carolina State Board of Elections found that over 4,000 deceased individuals had been registered to 
vote in the state, and that at least 14 of them had cast votes in recent elections.

It's worth noting that many INSTANCES OF DECEASED INDIVIDUALS VOTING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO ERRORS OR IRREGULARITIES IN VOTER 
REGISTRATION ROLLS, rather than intentional attempts to commit voter fraud.

To prevent instances of deceased individuals voting, many states have implemented measures such as:

Regularly updating voter registration rolls to remove deceased individuals
Requiring voters to provide identification or proof of residency
Implementing electronic voter verification systems

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."