From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: AOC May Be In Legal Trouble After What She Said About Trump
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:54:23 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:22:13 -0700, Alan says...
>
> On 2025-09-10 21:16, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:16:11 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >>> And vice versa.
> >>
> >> Yup.
> >>
> >> What questions would they ask AOC?
> >>
> >> Give an example of how that could be devastating for her.
> >
> > Pretty sure they'd crawl up her ass and stay there till they found
> > something, like use of funding??
>
> Who would "they" be?
Your favorite Tranny.
> > I guess you don't follow our news very well. She HAS been accused of
> > a few things that were probably not serious enough to go after her
> > for, but I'm sure they'd find something, IF Trump sued.
>
> But more importantly, you don't understand how the discovery process
> works in a lawsuit.
Think I do. (see below)
> They can't just ask her about anything.
Never said they could.
> >
> > Besides, they can't ask Trump ANYTHING outside the purview of the
> > lawsuit, stupid, and any and ALL of that has already come out.
>
> And suddenly you DO understand.
Yes... I looked it up on a website I'm pretty sure you are familiar with:
youarenotalawyerbutyouplayoneonusenet.com/we/can/help/you/faggot
> So how is it you think they can ask AOC about "ANYTHING"?
Never said they could.
> >
> > ANYTHING they THINK they can ask him to have a "gotcha" moment, will
> > be met swiftly with objections or pleas to the judge that all of
> > that has already been put into the record. Any "judge" worth his
> > salt, will have any and all questions that were asked in the Carrol
> > CIVIL hearing, quickly dealt with, in the manner of getting through
> > THIS lawsuit quickly.
> > > Again, they can ask away about Trump's past with women, but all he
> > has to do is repeat what's already on record. It would be hilarious
> > if Trump DID sue and ask for the venue to be New York.
>
> You assume that he can remember what he's already said.
No, but it seems YOU assume.
> >
> > Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez HAS no such past to "defend", so I'm sure
> > we'd hear some pretty interesting questions. I'm sure Trump's team
> > would vet her all over again, speaking with past friends and work
> > and school mates.
>
> Questions about what?
You're the one who thinks he's a law expert.
What kind of questions would they ask?
> >
> > I seriously doubt AOC wants to be sued for that reason alone.
> >
> > I doubt Trump's going to sue. He'll offer an olive branch and ask
> > for a simple public apology, which will have as good an effect.
> He won't get one.
(archived)
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."