From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: The New York Times gets caught lying again.
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:40:32 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-09-13 11:08, NoBody wrote:
> It appears the NYT doesn't bother to check anything when reporting
> something bad about conservatives. Yet another reason why they have
> no credibility.
>
>
> "The New York Times issued a correction on Thursday after falsely
> accusing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk of making an
> antisemitic claim on his podcast.
>
> The Times falsely accused Kirk of stating on his podcast in 2023 that
> Jewish communities are âpushing the exact kind of hatred against
> whitesâ that they want people to stop using against them. However,
> Kirk cited a tweet making that claim and critiqued it, causing the
> Timesâ correction to be made.
>
> âAn earlier version of this article described incorrectly an
> antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his
> podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and
> went on to critique it. It was not his own statement,â the correction
> reads."
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/nyt-forced-to-issue-correction-after-making-egregiously-false-claim-about-charlie-kirk/ar-AA1MqyGK?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=990fb4814c4d42fcb82897d9c4ee173f&ei=71
>
> Garbage in garbage out.
Ummmm....wrong.
He may have started out by reading someone else's tweet, but he went on
to say.
This is from a transcript of Kirk's podcast from November 16, 2023:
'But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish
communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites
that they claim to want people to stop using against them. '
<https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-defends-elon-musks-antisemitism-some-largest-financiers-left-wing-anti>
So while the original words may have been from someone else, he states
that they are "absolutely true".
And his podcast video is included there, so you can clearly see what he
was saying in its original context.
All the New York Times did was to correct that the initial wrong
reporting that the statement was his.
He did go on to say that the statement was essentially true...
...at length.