From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,or.politics,aus.politics,sac.politics
Subject: Re: "The Left Wants To Kill You. Wants All Normies Gone."
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:24:04 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-09-16 08:18, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "burch cassidy" <bcassidy@ucla.edu> wrote in message
> news:20250916.081251.c5b5f5e2@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> On 15 Sep 2025, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> posted some news:10a93hs$1ur7p$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Felix" <none@not.here> wrote in message
>>> news:miks3kFnrgaU5@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-09-12 20:32, Found Elsewhere wrote:
>>>>>> The Left Wants To Kill You. Wants All Normies Gone.
>>>>>> September 12, 2025
>>>>>> https://blog.reaction.la/politics/the-left-wants-to-kill-you-wants-a
>>>>>> ll- normies-gone/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Charlie Kirk was a normiecon. A normie. About half of democrats
>>>>>> support killing him, and the other half are probably lying.
>>>>> A "normie icon"? Really?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are these quotes "normie":
>>>>>
>>>>> "I can't stand the word empathy, actually," he said. "I think
>>>>> empathy is a made-up, new age term that does a lot of damage."'
>>>>>
>>>>> '"They [black people] were actually better in the 1940s. It was bad.
>>>>> It was evil. But what happened? Something changed. They committed
>>>>> less crimes."'
>>>>>
>>>>> 'Kirk was asked what he would want his daughter to do if she were 10
>>>>> years old and pregnant following rape.
>>>>>
>>>>> After calling the scenario graphic, he responds, "The answer is yes.
>>>>> The baby would be delivered."'
>>>>>
>>>>> 'Charlie Kirk:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Black women do not have brain processing power to be taken
>>>>> seriously. You have to go steal a white person's slot."'
>>>
>>> Fake.... Charlie named a few SPECIFIC black women, and his comment was
>>> specifically directed at them.
>>>
>>> Indeed, the quote above is NOT a direct or accurate quote.
>>>
>>> After naming the 3 specific women he went on to said " You do not
>>> have...." which is clearly directed to those 3 specific women he
>>> named.
>>>
>>> For those who think I might be lying or trying to downplay where he
>>> said.. here he is in the actual discussion in question.
>>>
>>> https://x.com/alluring_nyc/status/1965931096539017536?ref_src=twsrc%5Et
>>> fw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1965931096539017536%7Ctwgr%5Ee08c69
>>> 40a53dfc3cb945f3811faba0a1006bfa45%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F
>>> %2Fwww.snopes.com%2Ffact-check%2Fcharlie-kirk-black-women%2F
>>>
>>> Further this is the post used by snopes assert it's true, NOT because
>>> of what he actually said, but what some poster CLAIMED he said.
>>
>> snopes has the credibility of used toilet paper.
>
> Agreed, but I figured I would head of any claims that the statement has
> been "verified as true" by snopes..
>
>
While he may have been speaking in the context of those three people,
his statement was a GENERAL statement about women.