Davin News Server

"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message 
news:10ac6fk$2nfne$4@dont-email.me...
> On 2025-09-16 08:18, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "burch cassidy" <bcassidy@ucla.edu> wrote in message 
>> news:20250916.081251.c5b5f5e2@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>>> On 15 Sep 2025, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> posted some news:10a93hs$1ur7p$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Felix" <none@not.here> wrote in message
>>>> news:miks3kFnrgaU5@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-09-12 20:32, Found Elsewhere wrote:
>>>>>>> The Left Wants To Kill You. Wants All Normies Gone.
>>>>>>> September 12, 2025
>>>>>>> https://blog.reaction.la/politics/the-left-wants-to-kill-you-wants-a
>>>>>>> ll- normies-gone/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Charlie Kirk was a normiecon. A normie. About half of democrats
>>>>>>> support killing him, and the other half are probably lying.
>>>>>> A "normie icon"? Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are these quotes "normie":
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I can't stand the word empathy, actually," he said. "I think
>>>>>> empathy is a made-up, new age term that does a lot of damage."'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> '"They [black people] were actually better in the 1940s. It was bad.
>>>>>> It was evil. But what happened? Something changed. They committed
>>>>>> less crimes."'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Kirk was asked what he would want his daughter to do if she were 10
>>>>>> years old and pregnant following rape.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After calling the scenario graphic, he responds, "The answer is yes.
>>>>>> The baby would be delivered."'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Charlie Kirk:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Black women do not have brain processing power to be taken
>>>>>> seriously. You have to go steal a white person's slot."'
>>>>
>>>> Fake.... Charlie named a few SPECIFIC black women, and his comment was
>>>> specifically directed at them.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, the quote above is NOT a direct or accurate quote.
>>>>
>>>> After naming the 3 specific women he went on to said " You do not
>>>> have...." which is clearly directed to those 3 specific women he
>>>> named.
>>>>
>>>> For those who think I might be lying or trying to downplay where he
>>>> said.. here he is in the actual discussion in question.
>>>>
>>>> https://x.com/alluring_nyc/status/1965931096539017536?ref_src=twsrc%5Et
>>>> fw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1965931096539017536%7Ctwgr%5Ee08c69
>>>> 40a53dfc3cb945f3811faba0a1006bfa45%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F
>>>> %2Fwww.snopes.com%2Ffact-check%2Fcharlie-kirk-black-women%2F
>>>>
>>>> Further this is the post used by snopes assert it's true, NOT because
>>>> of what he actually said, but what some poster CLAIMED he said.
>>>
>>> snopes has the credibility of used toilet paper.
>>
>> Agreed, but I figured I would head of any claims that the statement has 
>> been "verified as true" by snopes..
>>
>>
>
> While he may have been speaking in the context of those three people, his 
> statement was a GENERAL statement about women.

Bullshit Alan.


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/charlie-kirk-black-women/


He was talking about  specific individuals and then started addressing them 
as if he were talking to them.

The target of his comment were the specific women he was addressing and NO 
ONE ELSE.

Alan would like to make this into something it's not. You can read it for 
yourself below.

"If we would have said three weeks ago […] that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama 
and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action 
picks, we would have been called racist. But now they're coming out and 
they're saying it for us! They're coming out and they're saying, "I'm only 
here because of affirmative action."

(this is the part where he addresses them direction)

Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be 
taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be 
taken somewhat seriously."