Davin News Server

Climate activists are finally hitting the acceptance stage of grief, and even the New York Times is admitting it. Their latest 
piece laments the collapse of climate politics, showing that the Paris Agreement era is essentially over. Promises made a decade 
ago to "save the world" have fizzled, with leaders skipping summits and deadlines ignored. Only a tiny fraction of countries met 
their update requirements, and many are backsliding.

Take Canada: New PM Mark Carney scrapped the carbon tax on day one and won big. In Mexico, President Sheinbaum is boosting oil and 
gas while enjoying sky-high approval. Voters worldwide are rejecting costly schemes, prioritizing energy affordability over vague 
"climate crises." Polls confirm it-people aren't willing to pay for decarbonization, a fact skeptics have highlighted for years.

The rhetoric has shifted from fiery moral calls to bland "pragmatism." Even Paris architect Christiana Figueres is rebranding it as 
a "climate economy," admitting the old approach failed. The Times throws in alarmist phrases for old times' sake, but the tone is 
one of resignation. What was supposed to be a global revolution has collapsed under its own weight.

This is democracy at work: when the public says no, politicians listen. The grief is all theirs; for climate realists, it's a 
welcome relief. The Paris dream of sacrifice and summits is dead-reality has won.

=====


New York Times Reaches Acceptance Stage
24 hours ago
Charles Rotter
80 Comments

Last month I wrote that climate activists were trudging through the famous five stages of grief. They had passed through denial, 
anger, bargaining, and were wallowing in depression, but true acceptance still eluded them. Acceptance would mean recognizing that 
the so-called "climate crisis" was never a physical reality but a political construct, that voters had rejected costly schemes, and 
that models could not substitute for reality. At the time, I noted they weren't there yet.

Then along comes the New York Times with a long lament titled "It Isn't Just the U.S. The Whole World Has Soured on Climate 
Politics." For once, the tone is less fire-and-brimstone and more sighing resignation. Read carefully, and the whole essay reads 
like an unintentional admission that the Paris Agreement era is over. Not just faltering, not just delayed-over. In other words, it 
looks very much like acceptance.

Consider how the piece begins:

"Ten years ago this fall, scientists and diplomats from 195 countries gathered in Le Bourget, just north of Paris, and hammered out 
a plan to save the world. They called it, blandly, the Paris Agreement, but it was obviously a climate-politics landmark: a nearly 
universal global pledge to stave off catastrophic temperature rise and secure a more livable future for all. Barack Obama, 
applauding the agreement as president, declared that Paris represented 'the best chance we have to save the one planet we've got.'"

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/magazine/climate-politics-us-world-paris-agreement.html

The rhetorical high ground was claimed early: Paris was not a negotiation over policy, but a plan to "save the world." The problem 
is that reality rarely cooperates with slogans. A decade later, the Times acknowledges that almost none of those promises were 
kept, nor were voters willing to sacrifice for them.

"At last year's U.N. Climate Change Conference (COP29), the president of the host country, Azerbaijan's Ilham Aliyev, praised oil 
and gas as 'gifts from God, 'and though the annual conferences since Paris were often high-profile, star-studded affairs, this time 
there were few world leaders to be found. Joseph R. Biden, then still president, didn't show. Neither did Vice President Kamala 
Harris or President Xi Jinping of China or President Ursula von der Leyen of the European Commission. Neither did President 
Emmanuel Macron of France ... In the run-up to the conference, an official U.N. report declared that no climate progress at all had 
been made over the previous year."

So much for the "indispensable" gatherings of the great and the good. When even the hosts are lauding fossil fuels as divine 
blessings, the facade is gone. What we see here is not renewed urgency, but leaders quietly disengaging from an agenda they know 
the public won't support.

"This year's conference, which takes place in Brazil this November, is meant to be more significant: COP30 marks 10 years since 
Paris, and all 195 parties ... are supposed to arrive with updated decarbonization plans. But when one formal deadline passed this 
past February, only 15 countries-just 8 percent-had completed the assignment. Months later, more plans have trickled in, but 
arguably only one is actually compatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement ... and more than half of them represent 
backsliding."

Deadlines ignored, pledges watered down, and "backsliding" the norm. Imagine if this were any other international agreement-say, 
nuclear arms control-where 92 percent of signatories failed to meet the paperwork requirements. Would anyone treat it as binding? 
Yet the Paris Agreement is still invoked as if it carries weight. The Times itself can no longer disguise the truth: it doesn't.

"To our north, the former central banker Mark Carney ... became prime minister of Canada in March and as his very first act in 
office struck down the country's carbon tax, before storming to a landslide victory in the April election. To our south, President 
Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico, a former climate scientist, has invoked the principle of 'energy sovereignty' and boasted of booming 
oil and gas production in her country-and enjoys one of the highest approval ratings of any elected leader anywhere in the world."

Here is democracy in action. Voters, given the choice, opt for cheaper energy and national sovereignty over international pledges. 
This is not the "complacency" the Times laments-it is the public will. When politicians who embrace oil and gas win landslides 
while carbon taxes are political suicide, the verdict is clear.

"You can't walk more than two feet at any global conference today without 'pragmatism' and 'realism' being thrown around as the 
order of the day ... this whole climate thing is just too hard."

So said Jason Bordoff, a former Obama adviser. In other words, the movement has run headlong into the limits of political reality. 
What activists once dressed up as a 'moral obligation" has been reduced to technocratic jargon: pragmatism, realism, difficulty. 
Translation: it's over.

The Times even admits what climate skeptics have pointed out for decades:

"Polls show that voters don't actually prioritize decarbonization and, crucially, aren't willing to pay much to bring it about."

This single sentence demolishes years of rhetoric about the "overwhelming public demand" for climate action. Support evaporates the 
moment costs are introduced. Politicians understand this; activists have resisted admitting it. Now even the Times is forced to 
acknowledge it outright.

And so the mood has shifted from revolution to resignation:

"Progressives long believed that climate politics was a kind of tug of war, in which tugging harder would pull many on the other 
side over the line into grudging support ... But it also looks a bit as if they pulled so hard they collapsed in disarray."

Precisely. The harder the push for Net Zero, the greater the recoil. What was meant to be a virtuous flywheel of momentum has 
instead spun itself apart.

Even Christiana Figueres, the architect of Paris, is now trying to rebrand failure as evolution:

"It's not about climate politics anymore. It's about climate economy."

Which is to say: the age of treaties, summits, and sweeping global pledges is over. If emissions decline at all, it will be because 
markets and consumers find renewable energy useful-not because politicians demand sacrifice.

The Times does not abandon its habit of sprinkling alarmist adjectives. Phrases like "terrifying pace" and "jagged future" appear, 
as if to reassure readers that fear is still justified. Yet the tone has changed. Gone are the "last chance saloons" and "final 
warnings." In their place is a weary recognition that the grand project of Paris has collapsed under its own weight.

In short, the movement has reached the fifth stage of grief. Acceptance. Not acceptance that the planet is doomed, but acceptance 
that climate politics as conceived in Paris is finished. The NYT admits as much without ever saying the word. The great cause has 
become a ghost: summits no longer attended, pledges no longer met, publics no longer convinced.

Last month, I argued that climate activists had not yet arrived at acceptance. Now, with this article, even their most faithful 
media allies are penning elegies. Paris was supposed to usher in a new moral order. Instead, it delivered a decade of empty 
promises, costly failures, and political backlash. That is the story the Times has, at last, begun to tell.

The grief is theirs. The relief is ours.

=====

September:

Autumn Snow Increasing
Signals Of A Cold Winter Ahead
World's Oceans Cool In September

Antarctica's Late Season Freeze
Arctic Sea Ice Minimum Higher Again In 2025
Atlantic Hurricane Season Stalls Out
NOAA Rewrites The Past - All The Time
Australia's $22.9m Climate Report Is A Joke

Concordia To -102.8F
More Polar Vortex Nonsense
New Study: Hunga Tonga Not CO2

Biting Cold In Canada's Far North
Cleveland's 22 Days Of Chill
Colorado's First Snows
La Niña Locks In, Cooling Deepens
Pole Shift Update
Auroras Reach CO

Stanley's Cold August
Snow Forecast In Utah
Britain Faces Blackouts: Net Zero Disaster
+ Sea Levels: No Runaway Rise

Nebraska's Coldest Late-Summer Stretch In Almost A Century
NSW's Cold, Wet Winter

New Zealand Resort Revived
NOAA Data: Cooler Than 1904
ASEAN Chooses Coal Over Fairy Tales

Coldest Start To September On Record
First -10Cs Of The Season In Russia And Canada
Snowy Australia
Antarctica Is Doing Just Fine
Atlantic Still Quiet Even At Hurricane Season Peak

Records Continue To Fall In U.S.
La Niña Update
European Winter Forecast Calls For Arctic Finish
Southern SSW
New Study: IPCC's Models "Significantly Overestimate" Sea Level Rise

Australya Turns Blue
September Chill In Central Canada
Records Continue To Fall In U.S., UP Sees Record-Early Snow

South America's Incoming Freeze
Record-Setting September Cold To Grip U.S.
This Year's Temps Among Coldest Since 1895
US Wildfire Burn Area At Decade Lows

Victoria's Best Snow Season In Years
Arctic Sea Ice Above 2011-2020 Average
Antarctica Has Been Cooling For 70 Years

Washington Posts Its Coolest August In 25 Years
Andes Under Feet Of Snow
Russian Ship Stuck In Arctic Sea Ice

Massive End-Of-Winter Snow Buries Australia's Resorts
Europe's "Hell Summer" Never Arrived
U.S. To Hold Cold For Weeks
Norway's Hydro Shortfall Puts Britain At Risk

Snow Piles Up In The Australian Alps, Even The Capitals
Reinforcing Cold Front To Extend U.S. Chill
Global Wildfire Area Down 30% Since 2002

More Record Lows Sweep U.S.
Canadian Arctic Slips Straight Into Winter
Summer Frosts Grip Europe's Lower Elevations
Record Cold Slovakia, Hungary's Lowest-Ever Summer Temp
Climate Central Caught Hiding Data

Perth's Coldest Day In 50 Years
Antarctica At -105.9F
Snow Closes Khardung-La
OK With Record Summer Cold
Germany Breaks Historic Cold Records As The Gas Tanks Run Dry

Early U.S. Cold To Impact 200 Million
Summer Snow In The Carpathians
Australia Forecast 3 Feet
Andes Hammered: Five Feet of Snow in Five Days at Valle Nevado