From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: To All The Stupid Vaxxers Who Were Stupid Enough To Believe Biden
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:02:48 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 9/18/25 09:00, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> Cancer risk surged 23% in people who received the COVID-19 vaccine,
> according to a peer-reviewed study published in EXCLI Journal
> in July 2025.
Nope.
> Approximately 300,000 people tracked for 30 months:
> mRNA shots increased risk of any cancer (+23%), breast (+54%),
> bladder (+62%) and colorectal cancer (+35%)
Also incorrect. Try this:
<https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12381369/>
[quote]
Anecdotal reports suggested an association between SARS-CoV-2
vaccination and some cancers, but no formal assessment has been
published. This population-wide cohort analysis was aimed at evaluating
the risk of all-cause death and cancer hospitalization by SARS-CoV-2
immunization status. Using National Health System official data, the
entire population of the Pescara province, Italy was followed from June
2021 (six months after the first vaccination) to December 2023. Cox
models were adjusted for age, gender, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and
selected comorbidities. Of the 296,015 residents aged â¥11 years, 16.6%
were unvaccinated, 83.3% received â¥1 dose, and 62.2% â¥3 doses. Compared
with the unvaccinated, those receiving â¥1 dose showed a significantly
lower likelihood of all-cause death, and a slightly higher likelihood of
hospitalization for cancer (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11-1.37). The latter
association was significant only among the subjects with no previous
SARS-CoV-2 infection, and was reversed when the minimum time between
vaccination and cancer hospitalization was set to 12 months. The
subjects who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed a substantial
reduction in all-cause mortality, and a risk of cancer hospitalization
that varied by infection status, cancer site, and the minimum lag-time
after vaccination. Given that it was not possible to quantify the
potential impact of the healthy vaccinee bias and unmeasured
confounders, these findings are inevitably preliminary.
[/quote]
And FYI, note these two parts in particular:
"Compared with the unvaccinated, those receiving â¥1 dose showed a
significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death,..."
and:
"...and a slightly higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer (HR:
1.23; 95% CI: 1.11-1.37). The latter association was significant only
among the subjects with no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and was
reversed when the minimum time between vaccination and cancer
hospitalization was set to 12 months."
First part concludes lower total mortality risk overall. The
repercussions here is that whatever claim you want to make for a higher
cancer risk, its observation of a lower overall means that the
non-cancer deaths have to have dropped by *more than* whatever increase
you want to claim for cancer.
Second part has two key elements: one of statistical significance and
one of a temporal element. Here is each piece in turn:
"...slightly higher likelihood...significant only among the subjects
with no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection..."
TL;DR: if one had a previous CoVid infection, the higher likelihood
failed to have statistical significance.
"...and was reversed when the minimum time between vaccination and
cancer hospitalization was set to 12 months."
TL;DR: transitory, for after twelve months, the risk became lower.
Kids, don't ever take advice from amateurs like "LitterMaid" here.
-hh