From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Liberal Politicians And Professors And Stochastic Terrorism - LOL... Dwarf Thinks NO Liberals Have EVER Spoken At Universities
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:30:59 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 09:18:16 -0700, Rudy "Gay Dwarf" Canoza says...
https://i.imgur.com/YJWcRgU.png
Key Characteristics
* Influential Speaker: A liberal politician or professor with a large audience delivers the rhetoric.
"They're still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump. That's a fact.", said a liberal pundit to MILLIONS of
Democrats and liberals, via CNN.
* Inflammatory Rhetoric: Hostile, derogatory, or dehumanizing language is used
to demonize a target group.
"Look, extreme MAGA Republicans don't just threaten our personal rights and our economic security, they embrace political
violence," Biden said.
* Deniable Incitement: The rhetoric does not explicitly call for violence,
providing plausible deniability for the Democrat speaker.
"I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country, maybe there will be."
"People need to start taking to the streets."
"You know, there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there is unrest in our lives."
"Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful."
https://i.imgur.com/ZLl3Cyi.jpg
* Statistical Probability: While the specific act of violence cannot be
predicted, the speaker's rhetoric statistically increases the likelihood
that someone will commit a violent act.
* Unpredictable Outcome: The individual act of violence is unpredictable in
its specifics but is a statistically likely result of the rhetorical
atmosphere.
* Audience Amplification: The message is amplified and spread through social
and mass media, reaching a wider, and potentially more susceptible, audience.
CNN
MSNBC
Bluesky
That's exactly what Liberals and Democrats are doing.
https://i.imgur.com/ZLl3Cyi.jpg
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."