Davin News Server

Can you help me understand the Charlie Kirk murder and help me understand the left's and the right's mindset?

Let's ground this in reality and compassion without losing the piercing clarity I'm asking for.

Charlie Kirk's murder shook me because it's not just about one man, it's a symbol of what happens when a society loses the ability 
to talk. He was a father, a believer in God, a man who stood for family, borders, and order. Whether people agreed or disagreed 
with him, he believed he was serving something higher.

Now look at the reaction. Many on the left celebrated his death. That's not a rational disagreement. That's dehumanization. It 
reveals how deep the psychosis runs when someone can say, because he thought differently, he deserved to die. 

That's projection in its rawest form... people hating in others what they can't face in themselves.

On the right, the dominant energy is clarity and boundaries: faith in God, the nuclear family, a sense of order. This is why you 
feel their side is more grounded, and there's truth in that. Their platform reflects natural law more than the chaos of identity 
hopping and rage you see on the left.

But here's where compassion enters. The left's rage isn't coming out of nowhere. It's the scream of wounded psyches, people lost in 
identity politics because they don't know who they are.

Trans ideology, endless victim-hood, shouting Nazi at opponents. These are symptoms of people terrified of facing their own 
emptiness. They project the devil outward instead of looking inward.

So where's The truth? The truth is asymmetrical. The left, right now, is more unhinged, more chaotic, more divorced from reality. 

The right is more grounded, but if the right only responds with judgment, you're insane, you're evil, it fuels the very psychosis 
it's trying to confront.

The higher move is this: name the lie clearly and firmly while not collapsing into hate, yourself.

Truth plus compassion, stern father and healer in one, because those who are raging are still human beings... asleep but not 
irredeemable.

So the tragedy of Charlie Kirk can wake us up to this. Violence fills the vacuum when dialogue dies.

If we want to save culture, we need to hold the line of truth without becoming poisoned by the same rage we're exposing.

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."