Davin News Server

On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 10:34:20 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:16:46 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2025-09-20 06:47, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:09:30 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2025-09-19 04:50, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:26:50 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2025-09-18 10:15, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> NEW YORK (AP) — ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show 
>>>>>>> indefinitely beginning Wednesday after comments that he made
>>>>>>> about Charlie Kirk’s killing led a group of ABC-affiliated
>>>>>>> stations to say it would not air the show and provoked some
>>>>>>> ominous comments from a top federal regulator.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The veteran late-night comic, made several remarks about the
>>>>>>> reaction to the conservative activist’s assassination last
>>>>>>> week on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Monday and Tuesday nights,
>>>>>>> including that “many in MAGA land are working very hard to
>>>>>>> capitalize on the murder of Charlie Kirk.”
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ABC, which has aired Kimmel’s late-night show since 2003,
>>>>>>> moved swiftly after Nexstar Communications Group said it
>>>>>>> would pull the show starting Wednesday. Kimmel’s comments
>>>>>>> about Kirk’s death “are offensive and insensitive at a
>>>>>>> critical time in our national political discourse,” said
>>>>>>> Andrew Alford, president of Nexstar’s broadcasting division.
>>>>>>> Nexstar operates 23 ABC affiliates.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/jimmy-kimmel-show-suspended-
>>>>>>> charlie-kirk-a2bfa904429c318fe52e7d3493c6883d
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> People have had enough.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "People"?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Which "people" would those be?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do you mean this "people":
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 'Earlier Wednesday, Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal 
>>>>>> Communications Commission, threatened ABC, Disney and Jimmy
>>>>>> Kimmel over a Kimmel monologue that included comments about
>>>>>> Charlie Kirk, ominously saying, "We can do this the easy way
>>>>>> or the hard way."'
>>>>> 
>>>>> Don't quote without a citation.  You already have no
>>>>> credibility.
>>>> 
>>>> Are you actually claiming I made that up?
>>>> 
>>>> <https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/media/2025/09/17/fcc-
>>>> threats-jimmy-kimmel/86206823007/>
>>>> 
>>>> Is that enough, or are you now going to insist I produce the video
>>>> of him saying it?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> No you idiot.  My words meant exactly what they said.  It's a shame 
>>> that I have to push you to properly attribute a quote.
>>
>>Your interest in getting citations seems oddly selective.
>
>Laughter!
>
>Any alleged quote that I see without a citation will get the same
>question.
>
>You fraud.
>
>>
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>>> 
>>>> Have you consulted your dictionary to learn what "all" means?
>>> 
>>> You asked me a question about a specific person and I instantly 
>>> condemned it.  You won't do the same.  That says plenty about your 
>>> intentions.
>>
>>Nope. It says I don't need to state the obvious.
>
>And yet you demanded I answer a very similar question.
>
>You fraud.
>
>>
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Have you condemned the violation of the 1st Amendment by the FCC?
>>>> 
>>>> <https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/18/media/brendan-carr-jimmy-
>>>> kimmel-fcc-first-amendment>
>>>> 
>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cpvlje8v17wt>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> The government took no legal action to remove Kimmel.  ACLU who is
>>> on the wrong side of virtually every topic???
>> > > Laughter!
>>> 
>>> Damn you're side is really flailing.  You're completely irrelevant.
>>> 
>>> Have you condemned the killing of Charlie Kirk?
>>
>>Do you know what "all" means?
>
>Then why did you demand I answer a very similar question?
>
>You don't hold yourself to the same standards you hold others to.
>Got it
>
>You fraud.
>
>
>Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>
>Run away.
>You fraud

And Alan has run away.