From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Charlie Kirk Wasn't Assassinated?
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:23:24 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-09-21 08:40, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> Not according to Google.
>
> He just up and died.
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1Q4xI-XUAEk6Aw?format=jpg&name=large
>
> This is probably just one result, but why was this allowed at all?
"Allowed"? "Allowed" by who exactly?
That's Google's completely automatic system picking up information from
Ballotpedia, Wikipedia, etc. and posting a summary.
So someone, somewhere wanted to call Hortman's death and assassination,
and some other someone (somewhere) just wrote that Kirk "died".
But freedom of speech seems to be a concept that only applies when you
like what's being said, doesn't it?