From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Jimmy Kimmel FAFO
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 07:03:04 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:48:49 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-09-21 07:34, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:16:46 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-09-20 06:47, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:09:30 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-09-19 04:50, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:26:50 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-09-18 10:15, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> NEW YORK (AP) ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmels late-night show
>>>>>>>> indefinitely beginning Wednesday after comments that he made
>>>>>>>> about Charlie Kirks killing led a group of ABC-affiliated
>>>>>>>> stations to say it would not air the show and provoked some
>>>>>>>> ominous comments from a top federal regulator.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The veteran late-night comic, made several remarks about the
>>>>>>>> reaction to the conservative activists assassination last
>>>>>>>> week on Jimmy Kimmel Live! Monday and Tuesday nights,
>>>>>>>> including that many in MAGA land are working very hard to
>>>>>>>> capitalize on the murder of Charlie Kirk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ABC, which has aired Kimmels late-night show since 2003,
>>>>>>>> moved swiftly after Nexstar Communications Group said it
>>>>>>>> would pull the show starting Wednesday. Kimmels comments
>>>>>>>> about Kirks death are offensive and insensitive at a
>>>>>>>> critical time in our national political discourse, said
>>>>>>>> Andrew Alford, president of Nexstars broadcasting division.
>>>>>>>> Nexstar operates 23 ABC affiliates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/jimmy-kimmel-show-suspended-
>>>>>>>> charlie-kirk-a2bfa904429c318fe52e7d3493c6883d
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People have had enough.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "People"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which "people" would those be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you mean this "people":
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'Earlier Wednesday, Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal
>>>>>>> Communications Commission, threatened ABC, Disney and Jimmy
>>>>>>> Kimmel over a Kimmel monologue that included comments about
>>>>>>> Charlie Kirk, ominously saying, "We can do this the easy way
>>>>>>> or the hard way."'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't quote without a citation. You already have no
>>>>>> credibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you actually claiming I made that up?
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/media/2025/09/17/fcc-
>>>>> threats-jimmy-kimmel/86206823007/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that enough, or are you now going to insist I produce the video
>>>>> of him saying it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No you idiot. My words meant exactly what they said. It's a shame
>>>> that I have to push you to properly attribute a quote.
>>>
>>> Your interest in getting citations seems oddly selective.
>>
>> Laughter!
>>
>> Any alleged quote that I see without a citation will get the same
>> question.
>>
>> You fraud.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you consulted your dictionary to learn what "all" means?
>>>>
>>>> You asked me a question about a specific person and I instantly
>>>> condemned it. You won't do the same. That says plenty about your
>>>> intentions.
>>>
>>> Nope. It says I don't need to state the obvious.
>>
>> And yet you demanded I answer a very similar question.
>
>Nope. I asked a DIFFERENT question.
Laughter!
You're rapidly becoming a complete waste of time.
>
>>
>> You fraud.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you condemned the violation of the 1st Amendment by the FCC?
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/18/media/brendan-carr-jimmy-
>>>>> kimmel-fcc-first-amendment>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cpvlje8v17wt>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The government took no legal action to remove Kimmel. ACLU who is
>>>> on the wrong side of virtually every topic???
>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>
>>>> Damn you're side is really flailing. You're completely irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> Have you condemned the killing of Charlie Kirk?
>>>
>>> Do you know what "all" means?
>>
>> Then why did you demand I answer a very similar question?
>>
>> You don't hold yourself to the same standards you hold others to.
>> Got it
>>
>> You fraud.
>>
>>
>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>
>> Run away.
>> You fraud
>
>Did you condemn the murder of Melissa Hortman at the time it happened?
>
>Have you ever once without prompting condemned ANY of the many targeted
>attacks committed by right-wing assailants?
Sorry but you don't get to demand I answer your questions whie running
from mine.
You fraud.
Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?