Davin News Server

On 2025-09-23 04:03, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:48:49 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-09-21 07:34, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:16:46 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-09-20 06:47, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:09:30 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-09-19 04:50, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:26:50 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-09-18 10:15, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> NEW YORK (AP) — ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show
>>>>>>>>> indefinitely beginning Wednesday after comments that he made
>>>>>>>>> about Charlie Kirk’s killing led a group of ABC-affiliated
>>>>>>>>> stations to say it would not air the show and provoked some
>>>>>>>>> ominous comments from a top federal regulator.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The veteran late-night comic, made several remarks about the
>>>>>>>>> reaction to the conservative activist’s assassination last
>>>>>>>>> week on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Monday and Tuesday nights,
>>>>>>>>> including that “many in MAGA land are working very hard to
>>>>>>>>> capitalize on the murder of Charlie Kirk.”
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ABC, which has aired Kimmel’s late-night show since 2003,
>>>>>>>>> moved swiftly after Nexstar Communications Group said it
>>>>>>>>> would pull the show starting Wednesday. Kimmel’s comments
>>>>>>>>> about Kirk’s death “are offensive and insensitive at a
>>>>>>>>> critical time in our national political discourse,” said
>>>>>>>>> Andrew Alford, president of Nexstar’s broadcasting division.
>>>>>>>>> Nexstar operates 23 ABC affiliates.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/jimmy-kimmel-show-suspended-
>>>>>>>>> charlie-kirk-a2bfa904429c318fe52e7d3493c6883d
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People have had enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "People"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which "people" would those be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you mean this "people":
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 'Earlier Wednesday, Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal
>>>>>>>> Communications Commission, threatened ABC, Disney and Jimmy
>>>>>>>> Kimmel over a Kimmel monologue that included comments about
>>>>>>>> Charlie Kirk, ominously saying, "We can do this the easy way
>>>>>>>> or the hard way."'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't quote without a citation.  You already have no
>>>>>>> credibility.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you actually claiming I made that up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/media/2025/09/17/fcc-
>>>>>> threats-jimmy-kimmel/86206823007/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that enough, or are you now going to insist I produce the video
>>>>>> of him saying it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No you idiot.  My words meant exactly what they said.  It's a shame
>>>>> that I have to push you to properly attribute a quote.
>>>>
>>>> Your interest in getting citations seems oddly selective.
>>>
>>> Laughter!
>>>
>>> Any alleged quote that I see without a citation will get the same
>>> question.
>>>
>>> You fraud.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you consulted your dictionary to learn what "all" means?
>>>>>
>>>>> You asked me a question about a specific person and I instantly
>>>>> condemned it.  You won't do the same.  That says plenty about your
>>>>> intentions.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. It says I don't need to state the obvious.
>>>
>>> And yet you demanded I answer a very similar question.
>>
>> Nope. I asked a DIFFERENT question.
> 
> Laughter!
> 
> You're rapidly becoming a complete waste of time.

Because your pea-sized brain can't deal?

> 
>>
>>>
>>> You fraud.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you condemned the violation of the 1st Amendment by the FCC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/18/media/brendan-carr-jimmy-
>>>>>> kimmel-fcc-first-amendment>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cpvlje8v17wt>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The government took no legal action to remove Kimmel.  ACLU who is
>>>>> on the wrong side of virtually every topic???
>>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>
>>>>> Damn you're side is really flailing.  You're completely irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you condemned the killing of Charlie Kirk?
>>>>
>>>> Do you know what "all" means?
>>>
>>> Then why did you demand I answer a very similar question?
>>>
>>> You don't hold yourself to the same standards you hold others to.
>>> Got it
>>>
>>> You fraud.
>>>
>>>
>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>>
>>> Run away.
>>> You fraud
>>
>> Did you condemn the murder of Melissa Hortman at the time it happened?
>>
>> Have you ever once without prompting condemned ANY of the many targeted
>> attacks committed by right-wing assailants?
> 
> Sorry but you don't get to demand I answer your questions whie running
> from mine.

Where am I "demanding" that?

> 
> You fraud.
> 
> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?

I answered that I condemn all murders.

Does Charlie Kirk not fall in the set of "all murders"?