Davin News Server

On 2025-09-24 03:57, NoBody wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:59:37 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-09-23 04:03, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:48:49 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-09-21 07:34, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:16:46 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-09-20 06:47, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:09:30 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-09-19 04:50, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:26:50 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-09-18 10:15, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> NEW YORK (AP) — ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show
>>>>>>>>>>> indefinitely beginning Wednesday after comments that he made
>>>>>>>>>>> about Charlie Kirk’s killing led a group of ABC-affiliated
>>>>>>>>>>> stations to say it would not air the show and provoked some
>>>>>>>>>>> ominous comments from a top federal regulator.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The veteran late-night comic, made several remarks about the
>>>>>>>>>>> reaction to the conservative activist’s assassination last
>>>>>>>>>>> week on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Monday and Tuesday nights,
>>>>>>>>>>> including that “many in MAGA land are working very hard to
>>>>>>>>>>> capitalize on the murder of Charlie Kirk.”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ABC, which has aired Kimmel’s late-night show since 2003,
>>>>>>>>>>> moved swiftly after Nexstar Communications Group said it
>>>>>>>>>>> would pull the show starting Wednesday. Kimmel’s comments
>>>>>>>>>>> about Kirk’s death “are offensive and insensitive at a
>>>>>>>>>>> critical time in our national political discourse,” said
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Alford, president of Nexstar’s broadcasting division.
>>>>>>>>>>> Nexstar operates 23 ABC affiliates.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/jimmy-kimmel-show-suspended-
>>>>>>>>>>> charlie-kirk-a2bfa904429c318fe52e7d3493c6883d
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> People have had enough.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "People"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Which "people" would those be?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you mean this "people":
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 'Earlier Wednesday, Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal
>>>>>>>>>> Communications Commission, threatened ABC, Disney and Jimmy
>>>>>>>>>> Kimmel over a Kimmel monologue that included comments about
>>>>>>>>>> Charlie Kirk, ominously saying, "We can do this the easy way
>>>>>>>>>> or the hard way."'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Don't quote without a citation.  You already have no
>>>>>>>>> credibility.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you actually claiming I made that up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/media/2025/09/17/fcc-
>>>>>>>> threats-jimmy-kimmel/86206823007/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that enough, or are you now going to insist I produce the video
>>>>>>>> of him saying it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No you idiot.  My words meant exactly what they said.  It's a shame
>>>>>>> that I have to push you to properly attribute a quote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your interest in getting citations seems oddly selective.
>>>>>
>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>
>>>>> Any alleged quote that I see without a citation will get the same
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>> You fraud.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have you consulted your dictionary to learn what "all" means?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You asked me a question about a specific person and I instantly
>>>>>>> condemned it.  You won't do the same.  That says plenty about your
>>>>>>> intentions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. It says I don't need to state the obvious.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yet you demanded I answer a very similar question.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. I asked a DIFFERENT question.
>>>
>>> Laughter!
>>>
>>> You're rapidly becoming a complete waste of time.
>>
>> Because your pea-sized brain can't deal?
>>
> 
> Laughter!
> 
> Thanks for proving me correct once again.
> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You fraud.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have you condemned the violation of the 1st Amendment by the FCC?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/18/media/brendan-carr-jimmy-
>>>>>>>> kimmel-fcc-first-amendment>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cpvlje8v17wt>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The government took no legal action to remove Kimmel.  ACLU who is
>>>>>>> on the wrong side of virtually every topic???
>>>>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Damn you're side is really flailing.  You're completely irrelevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you condemned the killing of Charlie Kirk?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know what "all" means?
>>>>>
>>>>> Then why did you demand I answer a very similar question?
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't hold yourself to the same standards you hold others to.
>>>>> Got it
>>>>>
>>>>> You fraud.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>>>>
>>>>> Run away.
>>>>> You fraud
>>>>
>>>> Did you condemn the murder of Melissa Hortman at the time it happened?
>>>>
>>>> Have you ever once without prompting condemned ANY of the many targeted
>>>> attacks committed by right-wing assailants?
>>>
>>> Sorry but you don't get to demand I answer your questions whie running
>>> from mine.
>>
>> Where am I "demanding" that?
> 
> Laughter!
> 
> Asking a question multiple times *is* a demand and before you go
> "aha!" my question to you about Clarlie Clark is intended to be a
> demand.  You won't directly respond to it directy  because you're a
> fraud and a lib coward.

No. ASKING is not a demand.

And you want different rules for you than for me...

...as usual.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> You fraud.
>>>
>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>
>> I answered that I condemn all murders.
>>
>> Does Charlie Kirk not fall in the set of "all murders"?
> 
> It's a direct question that requires a direct answer.  Of course since
> you're a hypocrite you demand direct answers but won't provide any.
> 
> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?

Buy a dictionary.

Look up "all".