Davin News Server

On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 09:13:28 -0700,  Rudy Canoza says...  

>  What happened to your previous lie, that it 
> was 1 in every "12.5" boys

You can't read, faggot.

If you're not going to read my posts, don't reply to them, faggot. 

The "1 in 12" is for FOUR YEAR OLD BOYS, you mindless man-fucker.

The "1 in 12.5" is for boys overall.

=====

Autism Rates Reach Unprecedented Highs: 1 in 12 BOYS AT AGE 4 in California, 1 in 31 Nationally
Feed

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released its 2025 report from the Autism and Developmental 
Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network, and the findings are alarming: autism spectrum disorder (ASD) now affects 1 in 31 American 
8-year-olds-the highest rate ever recorded.

FOR BOYS, the numbers are even more staggering: 1 in 20 nationwide, *AND 1 IN 12.5 IN CALIFORNIA*.

The report, which tracks children born in 2014, reveals a crisis growing in severity and complexity, yet broadly unacknowledged in 
the national discourse.

Autism has become a public health crisis of urgent concern," the report states plainly. And yet, government agencies have offered 
no new national action plan, and media coverage remains anemic.


The Impact of SB277 on Autism Prevalence in California

In 2015, California enacted Senate Bill 277 (SB277), which went into effect on July 1,2016. This legislation eliminated the state's 
personal belief exemption (PBE) for childhood vaccinations, making it one of only three U.S. states at the time-alongside 
Mississippi and West Virginia-to require full compliance with the CDC-recommended vaccine schedule for school entry, except in 
cases of formally approved medical exemption.

While the primary intent of SB277 was to increase vaccination rates and try to reduce outbreaks of communicable diseases, its 
implementation has coincided with a continued-and arguably accelerated-rise in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnoses in the 
state. Data drawn from the California Department of Developmental Services (CDDS) and CDC's Autism and Developmental Disabilities 
Monitoring (ADDM) Network offer a timeline of prevalence rates before and after the law's enactment:

Between 2014 and 2017, ASD prevalence among young children in California increased from 0.86% to 1.18%-a 37.2% increase in just 
three years. By 2020, according to CDC ADDM surveillance, 4.5% of 8-year-olds in California had an autism diagnosis-the highest 
prevalence among all U.S. monitoring sites.

Percent Increase Post-SB277 (2016 to 2020):
From 1.08% (2016) to 4.5% (2020) = 316.7% increase

This dramatic rise cannot be definitively attributed to SB277 alone, but its temporal proximity to the policy change-which 
effectively compelled full vaccine schedule compliance across all demographic groups-raises serious questions. Notably, this 
increase occurred within California's already robust autism tracking infrastructure (CDDS), known for conservative case 
identification that focuses on children with moderate to severe impairment requiring lifelong services.

While correlation does not imply causation, the magnitude and timing of California's autism surge post-SB277 should compel further 
independent investigation, particularly given that:

SB277 removed opt-out options for thousands of previously unvaccinated or selectively vaccinated children;

The increase is most visible in 4-YEAR-OLD COHORTS tracked soon after the law took effect;

California's autism rates now exceed 1 in 12 for those 4-YEAR-OLD boys.

In light of these findings, California may now serve not only as a terrible national model for vaccine compliance-but also as a 
bellwether for unintended consequences of compulsory public health policy.

Stupid is as stupid can't read... stupid.

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."