Davin News Server

On 29 Sep 2025, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> posted some
news:MPG.4344d43ead0f2f6998c1d6@news.eternal-september.org: 

> 
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 09:13:28 -0700,  Rudy Canoza says...  
> 
>>  What happened to your previous lie, that it 
>> was 1 in every "12.5" boys
> 
> You can't read, faggot.
> 
> If you're not going to read my posts, don't reply to them, faggot. 
> 
> The "1 in 12" is for FOUR YEAR OLD BOYS, you mindless man-fucker.
> 
> The "1 in 12.5" is for boys overall.

HAHAHAHAHA!

Another reason Rudy flunked accounting.

>=====
> 
> Autism Rates Reach Unprecedented Highs: 1 in 12 BOYS AT AGE 4 in
> California, 1 in 31 Nationally Feed
> 
> The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has released
> its 2025 report from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities
> Monitoring (ADDM) Network, and the findings are alarming: autism
> spectrum disorder (ASD) now affects 1 in 31 American 8-year-olds-the
> highest rate ever recorded. 
> 
> FOR BOYS, the numbers are even more staggering: 1 in 20 nationwide,
> *AND 1 IN 12.5 IN CALIFORNIA*. 
> 
> The report, which tracks children born in 2014, reveals a crisis
> growing in severity and complexity, yet broadly unacknowledged in the
> national discourse. 
> 
> Autism has become a public health crisis of urgent concern," the
> report states plainly. And yet, government agencies have offered no
> new national action plan, and media coverage remains anemic. 
> 
> 
> The Impact of SB277 on Autism Prevalence in California
> 
> In 2015, California enacted Senate Bill 277 (SB277), which went into
> effect on July 1,2016. This legislation eliminated the state's 
> personal belief exemption (PBE) for childhood vaccinations, making it
> one of only three U.S. states at the time-alongside Mississippi and
> West Virginia-to require full compliance with the CDC-recommended
> vaccine schedule for school entry, except in cases of formally
> approved medical exemption. 
> 
> While the primary intent of SB277 was to increase vaccination rates
> and try to reduce outbreaks of communicable diseases, its 
> implementation has coincided with a continued-and arguably
> accelerated-rise in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnoses in the 
> state. Data drawn from the California Department of Developmental
> Services (CDDS) and CDC's Autism and Developmental Disabilities 
> Monitoring (ADDM) Network offer a timeline of prevalence rates before
> and after the law's enactment: 
> 
> Between 2014 and 2017, ASD prevalence among young children in
> California increased from 0.86% to 1.18%-a 37.2% increase in just 
> three years. By 2020, according to CDC ADDM surveillance, 4.5% of
> 8-year-olds in California had an autism diagnosis-the highest 
> prevalence among all U.S. monitoring sites. 
> 
> Percent Increase Post-SB277 (2016 to 2020):
> From 1.08% (2016) to 4.5% (2020) = 316.7% increase
> 
> This dramatic rise cannot be definitively attributed to SB277 alone,
> but its temporal proximity to the policy change-which effectively
> compelled full vaccine schedule compliance across all demographic
> groups-raises serious questions. Notably, this increase occurred
> within California's already robust autism tracking infrastructure
> (CDDS), known for conservative case identification that focuses on
> children with moderate to severe impairment requiring lifelong
> services. 
> 
> While correlation does not imply causation, the magnitude and timing
> of California's autism surge post-SB277 should compel further 
> independent investigation, particularly given that: 
> 
> SB277 removed opt-out options for thousands of previously unvaccinated
> or selectively vaccinated children; 
> 
> The increase is most visible in 4-YEAR-OLD COHORTS tracked soon after
> the law took effect; 
> 
> California's autism rates now exceed 1 in 12 for those 4-YEAR-OLD
> boys. 
> 
> In light of these findings, California may now serve not only as a
> terrible national model for vaccine compliance-but also as a 
> bellwether for unintended consequences of compulsory public health
> policy. 
> 
> Stupid is as stupid can't read... stupid.
> 
>========================================================================
>======= 
> 
> "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
> 
> All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
> 
> "Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a
> person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of
> Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and
> reason." 
> 
> Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece
> in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three
> distinct phases or stages: 
> 
> "In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of
> proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
> as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
> 
> "The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
> vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely
> of hyperbole." 
> 
> "As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish
> fantasy from reality." 
> 
> The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
> knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump
> does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made,
> TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something nefarious,
> according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. -
> that Trump could do or say that would be received positively by
> TDSers. 
> 
> The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the
> early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch
> line for late-night comics and nothing more. 
> 
> Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term
> first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer
> back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute
> onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the
> policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W.
> Bush." 
>