Davin News Server

On Wed, 1 Oct 2025 09:26:47 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>On 2025-10-01 04:52, NoBody wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 16:21:22 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2025-09-25 04:03, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:38:54 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-09-24 11:36, super70s wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-09-24 11:02:57 +0000, NoBody said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 06:25:07 -0500, super70s
>>>>>>> <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-09-23 11:00:17 +0000, NoBody said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:35:00 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-09-18 10:15, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> NEW YORK (AP) — ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show
>>>>>>>>>>> indefinitely beginning Wednesday after comments that he made about
>>>>>>>>>>> Charlie Kirk’s killing led a group of ABC-affiliated stations to say
>>>>>>>>>>> it would not air the show and provoked some ominous comments from a
>>>>>>>>>>> top federal regulator.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The veteran late-night comic, made several remarks about the reaction
>>>>>>>>>>> to the conservative activist’s assassination last week on “Jimmy
>>>>>>>>>>> Kimmel Live!” Monday and Tuesday nights, including that “many in MAGA
>>>>>>>>>>> land are working very hard to capitalize on the murder of Charlie
>>>>>>>>>>> Kirk.”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ABC, which has aired Kimmel’s late-night show since 2003, moved
>>>>>>>>>>> swiftly after Nexstar Communications Group said it would pull the
>>>>>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>>>>>> starting Wednesday. Kimmel’s comments about Kirk’s death “are
>>>>>>>>>>> offensive and insensitive at a critical time in our national
>>>>>>>>>>> political
>>>>>>>>>>> discourse,” said Andrew Alford, president of Nexstar’s broadcasting
>>>>>>>>>>> division. Nexstar operates 23 ABC affiliates.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://apnews.com/article/jimmy-kimmel-show-suspended-charlie-
>>>>>>>>>>> kirk-a2bfa904429c318fe52e7d3493c6883d
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> People have had enough.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looks like maybe Disney isn't going to put up with the threats:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I thought you claimed the government was censoring?
>>>>>>>>> Pick a lane won't you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The government tried to censor Kimmel's direct bosses. It didn't work
>>>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laughter!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No they didn't.  Your false narrtive is exactly that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes they did. Trying to claim the FCC wasn't responsible for getting him
>>>>>> off the air on the stations in question is absurd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, Sinclair is standing by its principles and will continue to not
>>>>>>>>> air his show.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And those who still give a shit about the 1st Amendment (which lets 95%
>>>>>>>> of Republicans out) can stand by their principles and not watch any
>>>>>>>> Sinclair-owned ABC station, night and day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laughter!  The "outrage" was manufactured in the media.  No one cared
>>>>>>> nor cares now about Kimmel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Check the ratings last night dipstick -- both broadcast and streaming --
>>>>>> if you think no one cares about him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He'll be more popular than ever now so live with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These self-proclaimed guardians of the "public interest" will come
>>>>>>>> around when those ad dollars dry up you can take it to the bank, lol.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who's holding back ad dollars?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People who are boycotting Sinclair and Nexstar stations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No and I don't plan to. For no other reason than it seems to piss you off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He doesn't understand that good people don't need to state that they
>>>>> condemn murder.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Laughter!
>>>>
>>>> Why won't you specifically condemn Charlie's murder then?
>>>>
>>>> I know the answer...
>>>>
>>>>> "Instead of the angry finger-pointing, can we just for one day agree
>>>>> that it is horrible and monstrous to shoot another human?"
>>>>>
>>>>> Want to guess who said it?
>>>>
>>>> Interesting that you are ignoring the "angry finger-pointing" from the
>>>> left who have been trying to claim the shooter was a member of the
>>>> right despite loads of evidence he's from the left.
>>>
>>> Really? What "loads" would those be?
>> 
>> Quick summary of the proof:
>> 
>> "Tyler Robinson was not only a leftist, he was radical LGBTQ, per
>> newly released information.
>> 
>> After Fox News correspondent and reporter Brooke Singman reported this
>> morning that Tyler Robinson, accused of killing TPUSA founder Charlie
>> Kirk Wednesday, had a “transgender” partner, Fox followed up with FBI
>> officials. The outlet subsequently reported that senior FBI officials
>> confirmed Tyler was in a “romantic relationship” with a man who is
>> “transitioning” to be a woman."
>> 
>> https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/09/13/fbi-confirms-to-fox-kirks-killer-was-homosexual-living-with-transgender-n4943678
>> 
>> "According to an indictment, Robinson's mother told police that over
>> the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and left-wing,
>> "more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented"."
>> 
>> https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7v1rle0598o
>> 
>> Gay
>
>I don't see a word about him being gay.


Laughter!

Here's some more for you since you are "challenged"

""The roommate was a romantic partner, a male transitioning to
female," Cox said during an appearance on CNN on Sunday. "This partner
has been very cooperative, had no idea that this was happening.""

https://www.newsweek.com/tyler-robinson-roommate-transgender-2129832

Strike two for you.

>
>> Transgender boyfriend
>
>OK.
>

Now you admit he is gay.  Make up your mind.

>> Left-wing.
>
>So your whole "loads" of evidence boils down to "he [might] have a trans 
>partner.

There is no "might" about it.

>
>There aren't right wingers who are secretly homosexual?
>
>Hmmm?

Another non-rebuttal from you.


Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?