Davin News Server

On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:25:07 -0400, -hh says... 

> > Do that, and I'll retract and beg news servers across the globe to 
> > delete every article I ever wrote.

<crickets.wav>
 
> LOL, you'll never do any such thing: you'll keep on doing what you 
> always do:

Yes, I will, and faggot... you can do NOTHING about it, but continue to whine and cry and not REFUTE what was posted.

All you faggots, like Rudy and Alan, ever do, is whine and cry about the minutiae of a post and not the gist of it, pointing out 
stupid shit, like the author(s) not meeting YOUR criteria for being "experts" in the filed of the topic.

In this case, you, again, are not refuting what was posted, because you can't. You're whining about presentation.

Well... fuck that.

You have a problem with the way "we" here present topics and articles, too fucking bad... do not bother to reply. You low self-
esteemed nerds NEED to do this shit, for ONE reason only... you need to make you feel better about your lot in life.

Alan "Rich Kid Ski Bunny" Baker is a prime example, and you're doing a fine job following in his footsteps. I'm not as familiar 
with you, as I am with him, so I don't know... have you always been a whiner/cryer and not a refuter?

From what I remember in the short term, yu USED to at least try to refute the article, but I'm afraid you've taken up Ski Bunny 
Baker's bad habit(s) (among many) of needing to try and make him feel better by TRYING to show his undeserved intellectual 
superiority, by trashing WHO wrote WHAT article and whether they're an "expert" or not.

You have a much better mind, than to be wasting it on "protocol". Again, if you don't like what I write for subject lines, and the 
subsequent article, whether it 'matches" to your satisfaction or not, filter me out.

I REALLY won't mind. It's not like I sit here and say to myself; "I can't wait for hh to reply to me!"

> deleting points

How can I delete points? Only others than myself can do that. The "points" are all available in the thread. THAT'S permanent. If 
you delete parts of the thread or all of the thread... that's on you.

I "snip" for brevity. If ANYONE needs to be reminded of how the discussion is going, they can EASILY look back in the thread.

That's another stupid habit you've picked up from rich kid. Who the fuck wants or NEEDS to see the discussion (in its entirety) 
when they can just pick it up as it is?"

If they (you) can't look back and see how the discussion is going or what it constitutes, that's YOUR problem.

> and moving the goalposts to never have to publicly admit that you're wrong.

I don't move the goalposts. I'm either explaining what YOU didn't catch, or expressing myself FURTHER and more concisely. I spend 
as little time posting here, so yes, I will probably NEVER express myself perfectly, but then again, I am NOT a poet or 
professional writer, in regards to NEEDING to be perfect. This is USENET fer Chrise sake.

If YOU expect perfection from others, you are sadly in the wrong place for that.
 
> 
> > The article was NOT only about the mRNA vaccine, but it IS included. I made 
> > the title to reflect MODERN vaccinations INCLUDING mRNA, but not exclusively, 
> > dumb ass.

> So are you admitting that you made a mistake in misidentifying the topic 
> in the subject line?

Oh, fuck, no.

There was NO mistake.

My title did EXACTLY what I wanted it to do... lure in a bunch of pedantic faggots, to do... lure in a bunch of pedantic children 
to argue over semantics.

The discussion would be secondary, mainly because the stats and figures are 100% correct.

At NO point in time was mRNA the SOLE component of the studies. Hell, it wasn't even IN the snippet I posted, but it WAS in the 
whole article, so kiss my ass.

Please filter or killfile me, if you're going to be yet ANOTHER pedantic pussy troll, like Rudy and Ski Bunny Baker. 

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."