Davin News Server

On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 09:29:09 -0400,  NoBody says...  

> >I don't CARE what Trump's OPINION is on whose "fault" or "responsibility" a government shutdown falls on. A sitting President, 
> >which he was NOT at the time he said what he said, has nothing to do with whether the government shuts down or not, and you had to 
> >make up more bullshit to try and make it seem I'm wrong, when I'm not.
> 
> It's all the does because he doesn't know how to debate.

Oh, he "knows"... he just doesn't wanna lose.

He's got self-esteem problems. If his ego takes a hit, he HAS to change the conditions of the discussions to something he and ONLY 
he thinks he can "win".

Typical low self-esteemed liberal.

They feel the NEED to win against those ghosts of future past, who bested them in everything but math.
 
> >
> >Tell us... HOW can a President either prevent or cause a shutdown?
> >
> >We won't wait for an answer from you... just your usual bullshit deflections.
> >
> >To the faggot bin you go. 
> > 
> 
> Where he belongs honestly.

If he'd just argue "honestly", instead of looking for an angle to every discussion, making it seem he can win.

Have you noticed... he only does this with us. He's got a boner for those who speak the truth about liberals fucking EVERYTHING up, 
these days. And to make him feel better about himself, he HAS to try and take us on, arguing ONLY that which doesn't matter.

I say that the Democrats, no matter if they don't control either the House or Senate, can cause a government shutdown, and looks 
for an angle... bringing up Trump's OPINION on what he thinks about a sitting President which allows the shutdown, and yes... LONG 
before he became President.

The President CAN weigh in on Bills and Laws before Congress, but he can't vote on OR veto a shutdown.

And the STUPIDEST statement?

That me "valuing" what Trump says in an OPINION, changes anything.

Tell us, ski bunny... if I "value" what Trump says, HOW does that either start or stop a government shutdown?

> >> ...and he is directly contradicting you.
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > The President can't DO anything to shut down the government.
> >
> > Trump laying the BLAME on the President in an OPINION.
> 
> Before he even RAN for President...

Rich boy's too stupid to look things up on the Internet... probably having a servant do it for him... so I have no doubt he didn't 
know that either.
 
===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."