From: LeftistsAreMorons <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: The Schumer Shutdown
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 17:21:08 -0400
Organization: laughing at far leftists
On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 14:08:38 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-10-08 11:28, LeftistsAreMorons wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:57:33 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-10-08 10:54, LeftistsAreMorons wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:41:27 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-10-07 22:14, LeftistsAreMorons wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2025 20:34:52 -0400, Governor Swill
>>>>>> <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
>>>>>>> and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not
>>>>>>> be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
>>>>>>> supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing
>>>>>>> the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doesn't apply to illegals.
>>>>>
>>>>> It applies to everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Even Thomas Matthew Crooks? Where was his due process, Dummy?
>>>
>>> So because individuals violate people's rights, the government should be
>>> allowed to do so as well?
>>>
>>> Is that really what you're arguing?
>>
>> I've no idea what you're accusing me of arguing. For what it's worth,
>> I'm delighted that Crook was executed on the spot without a lawyer.
>> Fact is that due process can be very fuzzily defined.
>>
>> The idea that the BOR applies to illegals ignores the fact that even
>> back when it was written it did not apply to non citizens.
>
>Incorrect. Simply, factually, incorrect.
Did the BOR apply to the slaves?
Did the BOR apply to the Indians?
Who were the non-citizens that it did apply to?