From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: LOL... Rudy Barely Has The Brainpower To Wake Up In The Morning - This Is Proof - He Actually Looked Up a Facetiously Derived Animal [giggle]
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 23:32:43 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 19:49:39 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
> > God, you're so fucking stupid.
> There is no such animal as "Nepali Ghost Snow Monkey."
You stupid shitworm.
Please tell me you looked that up!
https://i.imgur.com/yXzkcH7.mp4
Facetious is an adjective used to describe speech or writing that is
meant to be humorous or playful, often in an inappropriate or flippant
manner, particularly when dealing with serious issues. It implies a
joking tone that is sometimes deployed at the wrong time or in poor
taste.
Etymology and Core Meaning
The word "facetious" has a rich Latin root that helps explain its
meaning:
It derives from the Latin word facetia, meaning "jest," "witticism," or
"waggery."
The literal meaning of "facetious" is "given to jesting" or "waggish."
At its core, facetious describes something intended to provoke
laughter, but it carries a few key nuances that distinguish it from
simple humor:
Inappropriateness or Frivolity: The humor is typically characterized by
a lack of seriousness or a refusal to treat a subject with the gravity
it deserves. A person being facetious is often flippant or treating a
solemn matter lightly.
Contextual Misjudgment: The facetious remark or action is usually ill-
timed or directed at an unsuitable topic. For instance, making a
facetious remark during a serious board meeting or a eulogy would be
considered inappropriate.
Wry, Teasing Tone: It often suggests a dry, ironic, or slightly mocking
tone. The speaker isn't necessarily trying to be cruel, but rather is
employing humor to avoid sincerity or confront difficult emotions.
Examples in Use
If a doctor gives a patient a grim diagnosis and the patient responds
with a quick, nervous joke, the remark would be facetious.
An essay written about a national tragedy might be criticized as
facetious if it uses irony and humor that diminishes the event's
importance.
In short, while all facetious statements are humorous, not all humorous
statements are facetious. "Facetious" implies the humor is lightweight,
slightly mocking, and often inappropriate for the surrounding
circumstances.
======================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a
person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of
Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and
reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece
in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three
distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of
proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as
if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish
fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump
does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made,
TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something nefarious, according
to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump
could do or say that would be received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the
early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch
line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term
first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer
back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute
onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the
policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."