Subject: Re: How It Started vs.. How It's Going
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
From: Paul Aubrin <paul.aubrin@invalid.org>
Organization: Eweka Internet Services
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 09:48:53 +0200
Le 09/10/2025 à 01:11, Alan a écrit :
> On 2025-10-08 12:14, AlleyCat wrote:
>>
>> How it started...
>>
>> Climate change increased the likelihood of wildfire disaster in highly
>> exposed Los Angeles area.
>>
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G2wj9D5WgAA2QI_?format=jpg&name=medium
>>
>> Â vs. how it's going...
>>
>> Arson suspect charged in connection with deadly Palisades Fire
>>
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G2wj9D5WUAAEgcD?format=jpg&name=medium
>>
>> NO climate CATASTROPHE... Rudy!
> There is no contradiction of the former by the latter, Loser.
>
> Now run along like a good little Trumpette, and look up the meaning of
> "former" and "latter".
>
To light a fire, you need some fuel, oxygen and a flame.
If the fuel is dry wood, you need a 225 °C flame to ignite it.
According to Stefan-Boltzman formula, the 1000 W/m² solar energy flux
will heat the ground at 364 K, i.e. 91 °C << 225 °C.
Please note that this value depends ONLY on the solar flux received, not
the ambient temperature.