From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: When Gay Ass Liberals Want To Refute, But Have Nothing But An Idiotic Analogy
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 22:23:40 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:05:37 -0000 (UTC), pothead says...
> On 2025-10-21, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:54:49 +0200, -hh says...
> >
> >> Having a 'direct line of sight" doesn't make it a meaningful threat.
> >
> > You fucking moron... it's a DEER stand. If hunters don't have "line
> > of sight" from a deer stand, why build the fucking thing in the first
> > place?
> >
> > My god, man... are you that stupid, or just trying to get us to think you are?
> >
> >> Case in point, we also have a direct line of sight to the moon, and it is
> >> well out of anyone's firing range.
> >
> > That is THE stupidest thing ANYONE has EVER said here.
>
> I had to read it several times just to see if I missed something ie:sarcasm.
> I didn't.
No... it was pretty stupid and he's just trying to be a pedantic little nerd,
like his buddy Alan "Ski Bunny" Baker.
Just another liberal reductio ad absurdum for when they feel they HAVE to
reply, but have no refutation. It's part of their self-esteem building, but
when they something THAT fucking stupid, it HAS to fall off to new low levels.
LOL
"Case in point"? "Sight to the moon"?
No "case in point", because there's nothing like that that's ever happened.
I'm sure plenty of people have shot in the direction of the moon, but what he
said was too off kilter even for that.
Liberals love to speak in hyperbole and hypotheticals to make themselves look
smart, like we see Alan Baker constantly doing.
They also love to speak in the future tense, knowing what they say can't be
disproven, unless it's just wildly wrong or impossible.
> > God DAMN me, for thinking you were one of the smart ones.
>
>
> At first I thought it was one of Rudy's forgeries.
> It isn't.
No... it's -hh. I would have called out the LITTLE faggot if I thought it was
Rudy.
Since -hh's been getting the Alan Baker treatment, he's started to act like
him, "refuting" me with bullshit non sequiturs and reductio ad absurdum and
stupid hypotheticals.
I almost didn't reply because it was so stupid.
Dumb ass liberals... if you don't have a valid argument, just shut the fuck
up.
=============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or
stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were
all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be
received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -
the very existence of George W. Bush."