From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: This Idiot, Idiots Again
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:37:38 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:46:01 +0200, -hh says...
>> AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:54:49 +0200, -hh says...
>>>
>>>> Having a 'direct line of sight" doesn't make it a meaningful threat.
>>>
>>> You fucking moron... it's DEER stand. If hunters don't have "line of sight"
>>> from a deer stand, why build the fucking thing where they don't?
>>
>> Because they're hunting deer which walk within ~100ft of the tree, not 2-3
>> miles to the airstrip.
>
> I guess moron hasn't WHERE the deer stand was, so I'll excuse your moronic
> bullshit.
>
> Show us where all these deer are going to be. Show us their feeding grounds.
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G3pzmlyXkAEOd_g?format=jpg&name=large
Source? Because I thought that Iâd read that it was allegedly on the north
side of the airport.
> The tree to which you are referring to, is in the middle of nothing but
> buildings and neighborhoods AND it's cut off by a canal, you dumb fuck.
>
> I guess you think deer-hunting is allowed there?
I didnât claim it was a deer stand: who did?
Could have also been just a random âtree fortâ of some young teenage kids
too, right?
> LOL... boy, you are one stupid nerd. I bet you've never even held a rifle.
Then how did I get that coin? Just because youâre profoundly ignorant of
its contextual significance doesnât mean that all of the other readers are
too. Ditto for the background image too.
>>> My god, man... are you that stupid, or just trying to get us to think you are?
>>
>> Has the SS said yet what the potential engagement range would have been for
>> this "sniper's nest"?
>
> Look it up, dork... I did.
>
>> I've not seen it mentioned.
>
> Because you've done no research.
Because it wasnât my claim, so I shouldnât have to do other peoplesâ
homework.
> Also, stupid... you think the SS is going to
> give out information like that?
The SS reveal such things when itâs in their interests to do so, and from
prior incidents, itâs already known that the SSâs perimeter screening area
is more than this alleged 200m distance.
> Maybe they should go on CNN and tell their audience of 12 HOW to set up the
> stand, put it in a spot that's X number of yards away and give them wind speed
> and directions for this time of year.
>
> God DAMN you are one stupid nerd.
No need to, for thereâs already better (& demonstrated) solutions for
non-amateurs, if this really was a real & meaningful threat.
>>> God DAMN me, for thinking you were one of the smart ones.
>>> ... so the bullet could reach the Moon in about 468 seconds or
>>> approximately 7.8 minutes...
>>
>> Nope, nowhere even close. Because folks smarter than you know that the
>> bullet never was going fast enough to escape Earth's gravity well.
>
> Wow... another case of liberals seeing only what they WANT to see. What part
> of...
>
> "Maybe the assassin could rent a rocket from Elon Musk and fly into orbit... "
>
> ... did you not understand?
>
> "Into orbit", stupid... means OUT of Earth's gravity well. Even in LEOâ¦.
Still wrong. Maybe you should figure out what Lagrange points are.
-hh