From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: When Gay Ass Liberals Want To Refute, But Have Nothing
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:42:37 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:05:37 -0000 (UTC), pothead says...
>
>> On 2025-10-21, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:54:49 +0200, -hh says...
>>>
>>>> Having a 'direct line of sight" doesn't make it a meaningful threat.
>>>
>>> You fucking moron... it's a DEER stand. If hunters don't have "line
>>> of sight" from a deer stand, why build the fucking thing in the first
>>> place?
>>>
>>> My god, man... are you that stupid, or just trying to get us to think you are?
>>>
>>>> Case in point, we also have a direct line of sight to the moon, and it is
>>>> well out of anyone's firing range.
>>>
>>> That is THE stupidest thing ANYONE has EVER said here.
>>
>> I had to read it several times just to see if I missed something ie:sarcasm.
>> I didn't.
>
> No... it was pretty stupid and he's just trying to be a pedantic little nerd,
> like his buddy Alan "Ski Bunny" Baker.
Cry harder, dumbass. Youâve already failed twice on your pedantic rocket
science attempt,
> Just another liberal reductio ad absurdum for when they feel they HAVE to
> reply, but have no refutation. It's part of their self-esteem building, but
> when they something THAT fucking stupid, it HAS to fall off to new low levels.
>
> LOL
>
> "Case in point"? "Sight to the moon"?
>
> No "case in point", because there's nothing like that that's ever happened.
> I'm sure plenty of people have shot in the direction of the moon, but what he
> said was too off kilter even for that.
Nope. It came from real world experience, and was a solution to quickly
shut down stupid Hegseth-esque bubbas who make stupid demands, to try to be
less stupidly unreasonable.
-hh