From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: When Gay Ass Liberals Want To Refute, But Have Nothing But An Idiotic Analogy About Shooting At the Moon
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:31:36 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:42:37 +0200, -hh says...
> > No... it was pretty stupid and he's just trying to be a pedantic little nerd,
> > like his buddy Alan "Ski Bunny" Baker.
>
> You?ve already failed twice on your pedantic rocket science attempt,
I didn't "fail" shit.
Firstly faggot... the topic is not "rocket science".
Secondly, I was being facetious because of YOUR pedantic non-sequitur and
reduction ad absurdum.
You're just another pansy-ass pussy nerd who feels the need to show how much
you know, by going completely off-topic and saying something as stupid as
"Case in point, we also have a direct line of sight to the moon, and it is
well out of anyone's firing range."
WHO thinks the moon can be shot?
Please show us the correlation of shooting something at a certain range, in
YARDS and out of a deer stand, and shooting at the moon.
There is none, hence my facetiousness about renting a rocket from Elon.
What was your point? That, just because something's in line of sight, it
doesn't automatically means the chance of success is 100%?
Of course not, but it WAS within rifle range.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G3unkyFWsAAtSAb?format=jpg&name=large
607 yards.
WELL within range, even for an amateur shooter and a non-sniper rifle. And it
doesn't look like a tree fort.
Watch this. I'm going to stay ON topic, unlike you.
The effective range of a .30-06 Springfield is typically around 460 meters
(503 yards) for accurate shooting, while its maximum range can reach up to
3,200 meters (3,500 yards) under optimal conditions. This makes it suitable
for hunting medium to large game at significant distances.
And if the assassin had access to military grade sniper rifles?
https://247wallst.com/investing/2023/08/15/the-16-sniper-rifles-used-by-the-
us-military/
700 to 2000 yards.
=============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or
stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were
all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be
received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -
the very existence of George W. Bush."