From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: See? This Is What I'm, Talking About - They Can't Even Stay
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 19:24:28 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-10-23 18:16, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:54:33 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2025-10-22 21:30, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> We went from talking about a deer/tree stand POSSIBLY being a platform for an
>>> assassin, to "line of sight", which DID pertain to the topic, to shooting at
>>> the moon, because we can see it, to gravity wells and weightlessness.
>>
>> And you proceeded to get it all wrong.
>
> Failure to produce this wrongness, means nothing.
You were wrong that a bullet fired from low earth orbit could reach the
moon.
You were wrong that being in orbit means you are no longer in Earth's
gravity.
>
> Your pedantic bullshit is all you have, whining about people using the term
> weightlessness.
>
> Typical liberal deflection.
>
>>> Good to know, but what, EXACTLY, does that have to do with a deer stand
>>> and a possible assassination attempt in the making?
>
>> There is no evidence to support a "possible assassination attempt".
>
> There is no evidence NOT to support it being a platform for a "possible
> assassination attempt", is there?
That's not the way evidence works, Loser.
>
> WHO has come forward and told The USSS that's NOT a place a possible
> assassination attempt could be made from?
>
> No one, stupid.
>
> There is no evidence to support it being a deer/tree stand, knowing WHERE it
> is.
>
> Also... there is no evidence to NOT support it being a "possible assassination
> attempt", because faggot... YOU don't know WHY it's there, so it CAN possibly
> be a "sniper's nest", knowing WHERE it is and what it CAN'T be... a deer
> stand.
>
> Give us YOUR thoughts. Why is a deer/tree stand...
>
> A.) so near an airport? I'm sure there is "NO HUNTING" allowed near
> there.
How are you so "sure"?
>
> B.) next to an office complex? I'm sure there is "NO HUNTING" allowed near
> there.
Is it "next to an office complex"? Show that please.
>
> C.) so damn near in the back yard of people living in a nearby neighborhood?
> I'm sure there is "NO HUNTING" allowed near there.
Show that it was a hunting stand at all.