From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Why Can't A Stupid Rich Kid From Cangaydian, Who Probably Went To Rich Kid High School And College, Not Know, That A Bullet Fired From...
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 23:15:58 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
... a low Earth orbit (LEO), not make it that far and "reach" the moon.
tl;dr
Answer: Yes, it is possible for a rifle bullet or projectile to reach the moon
from a low Earth orbit (LEO).
Want an answer like that? Ask the same question I did.
=====
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 19:24:28 -0700, Alan says...
> You were wrong that a bullet fired from low earth orbit could reach the
> moon.
Nope.
It can, given the right trajectory and taking into account ALL of the
"forcings" on the projectile.
I could have written to -hh, all of the things that would satisfy your
stupidity, but MOST times I'm not going to waste all that much time.
Just asking, "can a bullet reach the moon?" requires a LOT more of an answer
than yes or no.
I chose to use brevity, because I'm tired of you fucking nerds who all think
you're physicists, and refuse to spend any more time than necessary to get my
point across.
You dorks can say nuh uh, all you want... THAT doesn't change the fact that
what I wrote was correct. Just because I don't write 5,000 words to explain my
point, doesn't mean I'm wrong.
AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T OFFERED A REBUTTAL TO WHAT I SAID.
WHY is that?
Since stupid wants to ACT stupid:
Q: From a low earth orbit on a space station with had an external platform,
could a rifle bullet or projectile reach the moon, if all the trajectories and
forcing on the bullet were calculated?
A: Yes, it is possible for a rifle bullet or projectile to reach the moon from
a low Earth orbit (LEO). It would require extremely precise calculations and a
highly specialized platform.
From a LEO space station, the distance to the moon is approximately 384,400 km
(238,900 miles).
To reach the moon, the bullet would need to achieve just a fraction of the
escape velocity from Earth, which is about 11.2 km/s (25,000 mph).
Q: I asked this question before. You said a bullet from a .30-06 could travel
far enough from a low earth orbit could reach the moon.
A: You are correct, I previously mentioned that a bullet from a .30-06 rifle
could potentially reach the moon from a low Earth orbit.
A .30-06 rifle bullet has a typical muzzle velocity of around 2,700-3,000 ft/s
(823-914 m/s).
From a low Earth orbit, the bullet would not have to overcome the entire
Earth's gravity well, as it would already be in orbit.
Using some simplified calculations, I estimated that a .30-06 bullet could
potentially travel far enough to reach the moon.
However, there are many factors that would affect the bullet's trajectory,
such as:
Atmospheric drag: Although minimal in LEO, atmospheric drag would still affect
the bullet's trajectory.
Gravity: The Earth's gravity would still be affecting the bullet's trajectory,
even in LEO.
Stability and control: The bullet's stability and control during flight would
be crucial to ensure it reaches the moon.
Please keep in mind that this is still a highly hypothetical scenario, and
many technical and practical challenges would need to be overcome.
So... fuck off, and...
PLONK!
> You were wrong that being in orbit means you are no longer in Earth's
> gravity.
I never said that. I said you would be weightless, which IS correct and no
manner of your pedanticism and being obtuse can change that. The gravity pull,
even in LEO is almost undetectable, meaning you are essentially weightless.
> Your pedantic bullshit is all you have, whining about people using the term
> > weightlessness.
> >
> > Typical liberal deflection.
> >
> >>> Good to know, but what, EXACTLY, does that have to do with a deer stand
> >>> and a possible assassination attempt in the making?
> >
> >> There is no evidence to support a "possible assassination attempt".
> >
> > There is no evidence NOT to support it being a platform for a "possible
> > assassination attempt", is there?
>
> That's not the way evidence works, Loser.
Uhhh... yes it is. All you have to do is come up with a better theory, after
gathering FACTS, like, finding the owner of said stand and finding out if it
was INDEED a deer stand used for hunting.
Just because YOU'RE too lazy to look shit up to find alternate theories,
doesn't mean they don't exist.
You don't have ANY information, yay or nay, so I can go with whatever the fuck
theory I want, and there's not a damn thing you faggots can do about it,
except whine, like the pussies you are.
> > WHO has come forward and told The USSS that's NOT a place a possible
> > assassination attempt could be made from?
> >
> > No one, stupid.
> >
> > There is no evidence to support it being a deer/tree stand, knowing WHERE it
> > is.
> >
> > Also... there is no evidence to NOT support it being a "possible assassination
> > attempt", because faggot... YOU don't know WHY it's there, so it CAN possibly
> > be a "sniper's nest", knowing WHERE it is and what it CAN'T be... a deer
> > stand.
> >
> > Give us YOUR thoughts. Why is a deer/tree stand...
> >
> > A.) so near an airport? I'm sure there is "NO HUNTING" allowed near
> > there.
>
> How are you so "sure"?
Show me a place it's legal to hunt THAT near homes and offices.
Play stupid.
PLONK!
> >
> > B.) next to an office complex? I'm sure there is "NO HUNTING" allowed near
> > there.
>
> Is it "next to an office complex"? Show that please.
>
> >
> > C.) so damn near in the back yard of people living in a nearby neighborhood?
> > I'm sure there is "NO HUNTING" allowed near there.
>
> Show that it was a hunting stand at all.
Show me that it's not. If not...
PLONK!
=============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or
stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were
all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be
received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -
the very existence of George W. Bush."