Davin News Server

From: Found Elsewhere <posts@everywhere.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,or.politics,aus.politics,sac.politics
Subject: "We Cannot Live With These People"
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:10:55 -0400
Organization: Victor Usenet Postings

We Cannot Live With These People
October 27th, 2025
https://blog.reaction.la/war/we-cannot-live-with-these-people/

Charlie Kirk was a normiecon, and a highly effective and influential
influencer. So they murdered him and celebrated it. And still do.

The left, all of it, is persistently issuing a blood libel against the
right, which justifies them murdering us in "self defence", and instead of
disowning leftwing murders ("I oppose all violence" he piously says) repeats
the blood libel, justifying leftists' murders of rightists in the same
breath as disowning them.

For these people, all of them, disagreement is violence, justifying
retributive violence as self defence.

If a leftist is taxed on the murder of Charlie Kirk, and fails to disown the
violence of Antifa, Trantifa, and Black Lives Matter, he is saying that
Charlie Kirk had it coming, that I have it coming, that you have it coming,
that Charlie Kirk's wife and children have it coming, that your wife and
children have it coming, and as soon as the left is back in power, he is
coming for you, your wife, and your children.

If a leftist is taxed on the murder of Charlie Kirk, and says "I oppose all
violence" without disowning the left wing narrative that speech that
disagrees with them is violence, that thoughts that disagree with them is
violence, that thoughts of which one is not consciously aware are violence,
he is saying that Charlie Kirk had it coming, that I have it coming, that
you have it coming, that Charlie Kirk's wife and children have it coming,
that your wife and children have it coming, and as soon as the left is back
in power, he is coming for you, your wife, and your children.

The left continues to get lefter: Zohran Mamdani is about become New York
Mayor, after people in his campaign called on supporters to globalise the
intafada, and he elaborately and ambiguously weaseled all over the place on
the phrase, and told us that that the real victim of 9/11 was his aunt who
got some allegedly bad looks on the New York Subway. (Needless to say is
aunt was not in America at the time, but I suppose had she been in America
she might have gotten some bad looks.) He did not actually say "globalise
the intafada", but he did not not say it either. Much like a leftist
denouncing all violence, without denouncing the narrative that says that
your continued existence is violence.

The 2023-10-07 terror attacks in Israel were the Intafada. What is
"globalising the intafada" but killing people like Charlie Kirk, people like
me, people like you?

Schumer has been displaced as leader of the Democrats by Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez, who also wants to kill us all.

Normiecons are worried about Mamdani's tax and spend proposals, which seems
likely to drive productive businesses and valuable capital out of New York.
There have not been any productive businesses or valuable capital in New
York for some considerable time. New York is a parasite and a metastasising
cancer. The businesses that remain in New York derive their profit from
power, from the revolving door between regulators and regulated, and cannot
leave.

I am worried about New York becoming a base of organised violence for people
who intend to kill us all.

"I oppose all violence" combined with the left wing narrative that speech
that disagrees with them is violence, that thoughts that disagree with them
is violence, that thoughts of which one is not consciously aware are
violence is related to their redefinition of democracy. By democracy they
mean bureaucracy, a thousand kings three miles away instead of one king
three thousand miles away. Thus, if the merely temporary government
interferes with the running of the permanent government in order to give
effect to its election platform, this is dictatorship, autocracy, a coup,
oligarchy, and violence is needed to defend "democracy"

This redefinition of democracy is the inverse of the reactionary criticism
of democracy. We say that the merely temporary government is inherently weak
against the permanent government, leading to the problem of a thousand kings
three miles away, and only a single king is able to keep the bureaucrats in
line. They say that any interference by the filthy disgusting bitter
clingers is autocracy. If the bitter clingers elect someone who promises to
represent their interests, and he actually attempts to carry out the
programs on which he was elected, this is autocracy, and he is acting like a
king.

Which is the truth of reaction as seen by its enemies, that to keep the deep
state in line needs Kingly power. The theory of the founders was that no one
should have that kind of power, but this requires a virtuous people and a
virtuous ruling elite, and we lack either one. Because the power of the
permanent government is so enormous, intrusive, and pervasive, it can only
be controlled by a ruler whose power is even greater. Checks and balances
restrain only the merely temporary government, they pose no restraint at all
on the permanent government.

Every moderate mainstream leftist politician engages in blood libel against
the right -- a blood libel is to falsely accuse the outgroup of murdering
members of your ingroup -- thereby providing justification for your ingroup
to murder the outgroup. We are supposedly murdering blacks, we are murdering
transexuals, we are murdering undocumented immigrants, we are murdering open
borders protesters, we are suppressing freedom of speech by murdering those
who disagree with us, we are beating our wives. (Actually we are beating our
wives, which is part of the reason we generally have wives and they
generally do not, but the rest of it is of course a total inversion of the
truth.)

We cannot let the left take power ever again, for they will kill us all,
then kill each other. We need to restrict the franchise to married male
taxpaying property owning Christians with children. Or just cancel elections
from here on out. For a wicked people, elections turn into an advance
auction on stolen goods, and there is too much on the table, with what is on
the table to be voted on increasing in each election. It has to stop.