From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: More Proof That Liberal/Democrats WANT Drugs To Be Smuggled Into America And ALL Of Our Cities To End Up Like The Shitholes That The Democrats Run
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 23:35:48 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:13:20 -0700, Alan says...
>
> On 2025-10-26 20:14, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 08:59:10 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom says...
> >
> >> "We're just gonna kill people": Trump says he does not need
> >> declaration of war for Venezuela strikes - as it happened
> >
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > Obviously, you've never had a family member or friend die whilst on drugs.
> >
> > I'm sure there at least 300 million Americans who disagree with you
> > disagreeing with Trump.
> >
> > WHY give drug runners a chance?
>
> How about to prove that they ARE drug runners.
Why? They've got the intelligence, so why don't YOU ask THEM. No one here
knows anything, except you faggots on the left who pretend to know everything,
so you can WIN! your little nerd contests.
WHY are they firing on THESE particular boats?
Give us your best "I hate Trump" bullshit answer.
> As someone has pointed out, those boats would have to be refuelled at
> least half a dozen times to reach the US.
Yeah?
So?
What... you think these "people" are nice drug runners, who won't kill others
given half a chance, wherever they go?
They're spreading death and destruction, wherever they go, so why NOT give
them the Obama treatment?
You know... blow them up with cruise missiles and without evidence or a trial?
> The only reason to just fire on them is to avoid having to prove your
> claims.
FUCK them... they kill too many people wit their shit drugs... why not kill
them back?
Guaranteed... if Obama was doing this, you'd be cheering, JUST like we did
when Usama and all the other Muslim "generals", were killed.
Why should these drug runners get any better treatment, than those wedding
party members that Obama killed?
Were they guilty by association, so they deserved to be killed, along with
their children?
Well... these drug runners are guilty by association with the cartels and
their Jefés, so if Obama was right, killing women and children who were linked
to Muslim terrorists...
=============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or
stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were
all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be
received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -
the very existence of George W. Bush."