Davin News Server

From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: These Are The "People" You Want Running New York
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 21:51:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 2025-10-28 21:36, AlleyCat wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:32:13 -0700,  Alan says...
> 
>>
>> On 2025-10-27 19:42, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> Democrats think Muslims are harmless.
> 
>> I don't know what Democrats think...
> 
> Uhhh... are you lonely, tonight?
> 
> Did you REALLY take time out just to give us the information that you don't
> know what Democrats think?
> 
> You're not even REALLY prefacing your next useless statement.
> 
> Who CARES that you THINK you know what I mean when I post "people" in quotes?
> 
> What... you miss me this past week, and now you're showing how much by
> commenting on what you didn't NEED to post?
> 
> Shouldn't you think to yourself, "does anyone CARE that I post this?"
> 
>> ... I don't claim to be able to read minds.
> 
> Uhhh... yes, you do.
> 
> You ALWAYS claim to know what people mean by what they say, when you're wrong
> more than you're right.
> 
> It's your opinion, and you are entitled to that, but you always think you know
> what others are thinking, by what they say, especially on the Trump front.
> 
> He's usually trolling you loons on the left, but you ALWAYS take what he says
> literally, and again... you're wrong more than you're right.
> 
>> But I don't NEED to read minds to know what you mean by putting "People"
>> in quotes.
> 
> Uhhh... I do not care.
> 
> What... you've never called or alluded to someone being "sub-human" or
> something like that?
> 
> I don't see you ever whining about someone on the left, calling someone "sub-
> human" or something to that effect.
> 
> Should I just have called them "psycho squat-to-piss zero-achieving no-fight
> histrionical faggot narcissists"?
> 
> Yes... I think that's much better than "people".
> 
> Yet another post where rich kid has failed to address the topic.
> 
> PLONK!
So what DID you mean by putting "people" in quotation marks?