From: Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,or.politics,aus.politics,sac.politics
Subject: Re: "We Cannot Live With These People"
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:04:41 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
"Howard K." <howardk@siue.edu> wrote in news:10duvvt$1hbr1$3
@news.tcpreset.net:
> On 29 Oct 2025, Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
> news:10duj3e$3d01e$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> J Carlson <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in news:10dtarn$301no$1@dont-
>> email.me:
>>
>>> On 10/29/2025 8:02 AM, Webbster wrote:
>>>> Found Elsewhere <posts@everywhere.net> wrote in
>>>> news:10ds44f$1ugkq$1@news.tcpreset.net:
>>>>
>>>>> We Cannot Live With These People
>>>>> October 27th, 2025
>>>>> https://blog.reaction.la/war/we-cannot-live-with-these-people/
>>>>>
>>>>> Charlie Kirk was a normiecon, and a highly effective and
>>>>> influential influencer. So they murdered him and celebrated it. And
>>>>> still do.
>>>>>
>>>>> The left, all of it, is persistently issuing a blood libel against
>> the
>>>>> right, which justifies them murdering us in "self defence", and
>>>>> instead of disowning leftwing murders ("I oppose all violence" he
>>>>> piously says) repeats the blood libel, justifying leftists' murders
>> of
>>>>> rightists in the same breath as disowning them.
>>>>>
>>>> Blaming "the left" for Kirk's murder is Blood Libel.
>>>
>>> You don't know what the term "blood libel" means, you ignorant
>>> fuckwit.
>>>
>>
>> The fuck I don't. I know the origin of the term. And here I used in
>> the same manner as the OP.
>
> Blood libels are usually based on false premises.
>
And blaming "the left" for Kirk's murder is Blood Libel. "The left" had
nothing to do with Kirk's murder.
--
@..@
(----)
----------
United we ribbit, divided we croak