From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Poor Rudy... Has To Play Bullshit Liberal Semantics Games, Because He Doesn't Want Others To Know He Lies - Poor TDS Sufferer
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 20:16:57 -0600
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 12:55:47 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
> >>> Why do you leftist losers always seem to take the side of the bad guys?
> >>
> >> Because they insist we follow the law.
> >
> > What "law" allowed Obama to kill women and children at a wedding and more?
>
> Obama didn't do that, you stupid fucknozzle.
Poor misguided and stupid Rudy. Thinks saying Obama didn't "do that" himself,
makes it true.
No, faggot... that is a lie. If Trump had ordered that drone, you and all the
other faggots here would lose your tiny fucking minds.
Here it is... short and sweet:
On August 29, 2010, a US drone strike targeted a vehicle in Yemen, killing 15
people, including the intended target, Anwar al-Awlaki, a US-born Yemeni
cleric and a senior leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).
The strike also killed several civilians, including some who were attending a
wedding.
The incident was widely reported and sparked controversy, with many
criticizing Obama for its use of drone strikes and its handling of civilian
casualties.
The White House initially denied that a wedding was targeted, claiming that
the strike was aimed at al-Awlaki and other militants.
However, subsequent investigations and reports suggested that a wedding party
was indeed present at the site, and that many civilians were killed or
injured.
The incident highlighted the complexities and challenges of using drone
strikes in counterterrorism efforts, particularly in regions with limited
infrastructure and oversight.
It also raised concerns about the potential for civilian casualties and the
need for greater transparency and accountability in the use of drone strikes.
In response to criticism, Obama implemented new guidelines for drone strikes,
including stricter standards for targeting and a greater emphasis on
minimizing civilian casualties.
However, the use of drone strikes remains a contentious issue, with many
arguing that they are an effective tool in the fight against terrorism, while
others raise concerns about their impact on civilians and the broader
implications for international law and human rights.
*****=====*****=====*****=====*****=====*****=====*****=====*****=====*****
Rudy's so ate up with TDS, it's quite hilarious.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike of Donald Trump, to the
point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into three distinct phases or
stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, as if 140 characters were
all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting solely of
hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything Trump does. If Trump
announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would
suggest he was up to something nefarious, according to the logic of TDS.
There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be
received positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a punch line for late-
night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer back in 2003.
The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in
otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay -
the very existence of George W. Bush."