From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,or.politics,aus.politics,sac.politics
Subject: Re: "We Cannot Live With These People"
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 17:46:16 +1100
On Thu, 06 Nov 2025 16:54:42 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 05:11:15 -0000 (UTC), Webbster
> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:i0ongkho0q02k84jisitjb9qe5mv29f9hl@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:25:44 -0800, "chine.bleu"
>>> <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>> Webbster wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:10efvhj$hnp7$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chuckie Schumer is responsible for cutting off SNAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Trump had to be ordered by the courts to use the contingency=
>>>>> funds for SNAP. And he's still balking about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, the irony! Project much?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How did the elections go for you last night?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask Trump why they went the way they did.
>>>>>
>>>>> =E2=80=9CTRUMP WASN=E2=80=99T ON THE BALLOT, AND SHUTDOWN, WE=
RE THE TWO
>>>>> REASONS THAT REPUBLICANS LOST ELECTIONS TONIGHT,=E2=80=9D
>>>>>
>>>>> People know that the Democrats won't yield to slashing the ACA,
>>>>> and that the Republicans are holding SNAP hostage.
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, "TRUMP" *was* on the ballot. He *wants* a
>>>>> shutdown, and the people know it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What kind of losers need healthcare *and* food?
>>>>
>>> Those that don't wan't to work, want everyone working to pay for it.=
>> Red States take more SNAP and ACA subsidies than Blue.
> <https://acasignups.net/25/10/29/red-vs-blue-whos-about-be-screwed-mos=
t-snap-benefits-ending>
> blue states tend to have more SNAP recipients relative to population,=
Hardly surprising that they mostly vote blue
> while red states have a higher proportion of residents relying on ACA
> subsidies.
Hardly surprising that they mostly vote red
> Both programs affect people across the political spectrum,
> but their impact and distribution vary by state and district political=
> alignment.
> Thus, the statement is correct if qualified: red states take more ACA
> subsidies, but blue states take more SNAP benefits per capita.?
>>> A major part of the Democrat voting Bloc along with no voter ID
>>> <https://ibb.co/Q34dQsm7>
>>>
>>> iIn those blue states the elections are rigged. They have no Voter
>>> ID=E2=80=A6they have mail-in ballots without any Voter ID required=E2=
=80=A6
>>
>> For Mail-in, you absolutely need ID to Register. The ballot is maile=
d =
>> to
>> the person registered - no one else. You have to sign the ballot
>> envelope - which is then matched against your Registration signiture.=
>> That method is good enough for banks.
> The assertion that blue states generally do not have good or strict
> voter ID laws is largely accurate.
> https://ibb.co/Q34dQsm7
> US States political map
Pity about the exceptions
> <https://votingrightslab.org/report/2025-legislative-sessions-to-date-=
key-election-policy-trends/>
> https://tinyurl.com/yf8xrt97
> Currently, 36 states require some form of voter ID at the polls, but
> among these, blue-leaning states tend to have less strict laws or
> allow broader options for acceptable ID.
Hardly surprising given that the blue voter have
more difficulty proving those so they can vote
> For example, many blue states
> do not require photo ID
Hardly surprising given that the blue voter
have more difficulty having one of those
> or allow alternatives such as utility bills,
Ditto
> student IDs, or other non-photo documents.
Ditto
> Some blue states, including
> California, New York, and others, do not require any ID at the ballot
> box for in-person voting, although they may require ID at registration=
> or allow voters to be vouched for by another vote
Hardly surprising given that the blue voter
have more difficulty having one of those
> <https://www.perplexity.ai/search/while-about-one-fifth-of-all-u-5c39c=
0ItRLqkNpseiUzApQ#0>
> https://tinyurl.com/bp99m6xz
That steaming turd again
> While about one-fifth of all U.S. workers are employed in government
> roles and a substantial fraction of the electorate depends on some
> form of government assistance, the overall percentage of the U.S.
> electorate directly reliant on government income is likely between
> 20-30%.
> This forms a crucial voting bloc, especially for Democrats,
Again, you have no fucking idea if they even bother to vote
> who work
> to maintain this support base despite concerns about economic
> productivity.
More mindless bullshit
> That's why the Democrats wanted to reduce Productive Tax payers
> (Private enterprise)
More mindless bullshit
> To Non-Productive tax payers,
> NGO's, welfare, government departments
> The problem with Unproductive tax payers, is that governments
> eventually run out of Productive taxpayers money
More mindless bullshit given that Norway actually got
the exact opposite, an immense sovereign wealth fund,
larges in the entire fucking work
> In summary:
> About 20% of workers are employed by government at some level.?
> Around 30=E2=80=9335% of the electorate likely draws direct income fro=
m
> government sources.?
> This forms a core voting bloc, crucial for Democrats,
Again, you have no fucking idea if they even bother to vote
> while conservatives view it as a challengeto economic productivity an=
d =
> tax sustainability
Plenty of them are productive, fuckwit