Subject: Re: Why Trump is deploying the national guard
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 07:24:48 +0000
From: liars anonymous <noreply@mixmin.net>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.south-africa,alt.politics.republicans,sac.politics,can.politics,rec.food.cooking,aus.politics
On 05 Nov 2025, ball <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> posted
some news:rVTOQ.455515$DOhc.426442@fx06.iad:
> On 11/5/2025 1:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
> another content-free batch of lies:
>
>> In article <azOOQ.984295$7Ika.157136@fx17.iad>,
>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>
>>> On 11/5/2025 11:41 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
>>> do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
>>>
>>>> In article <LtLOQ.235042$ol44.35771@fx33.iad>,
>>>> another.wieber.loser@arent.they.all says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/5/2025 8:49 AM, Attila wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:29:30 -0800, Duane D La Motte
>>>>>> <another.wieber.loser@arent.they.all> in alt.atheism with
>>>>>> message-id <v3KOQ.719174$Tux4.22601@fx11.iad> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/5/2025 2:43 AM, Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 15:10:14 -0800, Duane D La Motte
>>>>>>>> <another.wieber.loser@arent.they.all> in alt.atheism with
>>>>>>>> message-id <rJvOQ.238804$0vja.136049@fx35.iad> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/4/2025 2:15 PM, Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 06:49:25 -0800, Duane D La Motte
>>>>>>>>>> <another.wieber.loser@arent.they.all> in alt.atheism with
>>>>>>>>>> message-id <WnoOQ.1088771$k_17.336567@fx10.iad> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/2025 5:27 AM, Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 23:21:32 -0800, Duane D La Motte
>>>>>>>>>>>> <another.wieber.loser@arent.they.all> in alt.atheism with
>>>>>>>>>>>> message-id <0KYNQ.288759$pQe6.171891@fx40.iad> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/2/2025 11:01 PM, Collectivism_Always_Fails wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 23:30:09 -0700, Gronk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 23:38:16 -0600, Gronk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalide@invalid.invalid> in alt.atheism with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message-id
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nickname unavailable wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/19/2025 9:43 PM, Attila wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 01:55:41 +0000, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2025 11:49:37 -0700, "chine.bleu"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 15:27:26 -0400, Attila
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <prochoice@here.now>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 11:35:49 -0700,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "chine.bleu"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Swill wrote:Nozomu Mochitsuki
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ÃÂ ÃÂ Even illegals cannot be arrested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the police a reasonable suspicion they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True.ÃÂ I have no idea what intelligence ICE has to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID illegals.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None ? they have *no* intelligence to identify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> undocumented immigrants. They're just snatching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-skinned people and people who speak with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spanish accents off the streets. It's pure racial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profiling.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He won't get it. Or, he'll deny it and still say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he has no clue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get exactly what is going on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think someone who otherwise has no criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> background should be deported for being here illegally?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. They're working and paying taxes. Steer them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into getting citizenship.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YOu want to reward them for breaking the law?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unlawful presence is not a crime, asshole.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a violation of federal law no matter what you call
>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a crime. Someone who overstays a visa is not
>>>>>>>>>>> breaking any law.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Their physical presence in the US is illegal under federal
>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It isn't a crime.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Call it whatever you like - being in the country without a
>>>>>>>> legal status is a violation of federal law no matter how
>>>>>>>> entry was made or when.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is not a violation of law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
>>>>>> of 1996 (IIRIRA): This act strengthened border control and
>>>>>> streamlined deportation, increased penalties for certain
>>>>>> violations, and added restrictions on asylum applications.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Key provisions of IIRIRA
>>>>>> Reentry bars: Unlawfully present immigrants
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that's the correct term, not "illegals."
>>>>>
>>>>>> face a 3-year bar from reentering the U.S.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is a civil, not a criminal, penalty.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8 U.S. Code ç 1325 - Improper entry by alien
>>>>>
>>>>> Not interested. Has no bearing on unlawful presence.
>>>>
>>>> Hey Professor, how did they unlawfully get present?
>>>
>>> Overstayed their visas after entering lawfully, you stupid
>>> fuckstain.
>>
>> Let's not forget those who crossed illegally.
>
> You don't know of any.
You're saying all the media stories about Texas busing illegal aliens to
blue states was a lie?