From: Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,or.politics,aus.politics,sac.politics
Subject: Re: "WWII Wasn't Worth It"
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 04:53:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote in
news:6442hk5sc92qgoo8k83fn22sgj290ij38h@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2025 21:02:06 -0000 (UTC), J D <j_d@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 08 Nov 2025, Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
>>news:10eo0k8$2obgp$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Found Elsewhere <posts@everywhere.net> wrote in
>>> news:10emoj9$3jh8i$1@news.tcpreset.net:
>>>
>>>> WWII Wasn't Worth It
>>>> November 7, 2025
>>>> https://voxday.net/2025/11/07/wwii-wasnt-worth-it/
>>>>
>>>> A British WWII veteran issues a scathing verdict[1] on the state of
>>>> Britain today and his regrets about having defended what is now a
>>>> collapsing, demoralized, half-occupied nation:
>>>>
>>>> > A 100-year-old veteran shocked the hosts of Good Morning Britain
>>>> > today by declaring that winning World War II 'wasn't worth it'
>>>> > due to the state of the UK.
>>>> >
>>>> > Alec Penstone told Adil Ray and Kate Garraway how he quit his
>>>> > factory job to sign up for the Royal Navy and fight for his
>>>> > country as soon as he came of age. The war hero recalled serving
>>>> > alongside close friends, many of whom lost their lives, and
>>>> > called himself 'just a lucky one' for having survived. Asked by
>>>> > Ms Garraway what Remembrance Sunday meant to him, the veteran
>>>> > said he felt that winning the war was 'not worth' how the country
>>>> > had turned out today.
>>>> >
>>>> > 'My message is, I can see in my mind's eye those rows and rows of
>>>> > white stones and all the hundreds of my friends who gave their
>>>> > lives, for what? The country of today? No, I'm sorry - but the
>>>> > sacrifice wasn't worth the result of what it is now.'
>>>> >
>>>> > When he was asked to clarify what he meant by Mr Ray, he
>>>> > continued: 'What we fought for was our freedom, but now it's a
>>>> > darn sight worse than when I fought for it.'
>>>>
>>>> What was the point of defending Britain against the potential
>>>> threat posed by 3 million Germans in order to turn around and
>>>> meekly submit to the subsequent invasion of 3 million Indians, 2
>>>> million Pakistanis, 2.5 million Africans, and 500,000 Chinese?
>>>>
>>>> What was the threat, that they might end up speaking the same
>>>> language as their royal family, the Saxe-Coburg and Gothas, all
>>>> spoke originally?
>>>>
>>>> What a historical disaster. The sacrifice of all those young
>>>> Englishmen absolutely wasn't worth it. But perhaps the old English
>>>> veteran can find some solace in the fact that even the Viking and
>>>> Roman invaders were eventually sent home.
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tv/article-15268525/world-war-two-vetera
>>>> n-g mb-adil-ray-kate-garraway.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> He's a racist bigot, what else is new?
>>
>>He's a "racist bigot" because he wore a uniform, stood for his
>>country, fought for it, and now condemns those trying to destroy it
>>via social activism platforms?
>>
>
> Is it racism if it's true?
>
he's a racist bigot because he hates them because they are non-white. He
made no complant about "social activism platforms" nor even mention,
--
@..@
(----)
----------
United we ribbit, divided we croak