Davin News Server

On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 11:26:59 -0000 (UTC)
Dhu on Gate <campbell@neotext.ca> wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 08:03:48 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D=E2=80=99Oliveiro wrot=
e:
>=20
> > On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 06:58:35 -0000 (UTC), Dhu on Gate wrote:
> >  =20
> >> NASA hit back on Thursday at [another random celebrity=E2=80=99s] clai=
m=20
> >> that the 1969 moon landing "didn't happen," a theory consistently=20
> >> debunked over decades. =20
> >=20
> > Remember, there was a Cold War then, the Soviets had as good
> > telescopes and radio equipment as anybody else, and would not have
> > hesitated at any excuse to have a laugh at America=E2=80=99s expense. T=
here
> > was no way they would have been fooled, and it would have been a
> > massive propaganda coup to expose the deception.
> >=20
> > I remember mentioning this online once. The other person who kept=20
> > insisting the Moon landings were faked then went on to claim that
> > the Cold War was faked as well. =20
>=20
> True enough, but as well what I saw back in '69 couldn't be "faked
> up" with any computers we had back then and faking it would have co$t
> more than just doing it, anyways.  Reality tends to be like that.
>=20
> Dhu
>=20
>=20
> >=20
> > Conspiracy theorists, when they=E2=80=99re in a hole, just don=E2=80=99=
t know how
> > (or want to) get out, they just keep digging deeper ... =20
>=20
>  --=20
> Je suis Canadien:
>   Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais,
>   C'est une esp`ece de sauvage.=20
>   Ne obliviscaris: vix ea nostra voco!
>=20
>  *A mari ad mari ad mari*
>=20
>   Duncan Patton a Campbell
>=20

Richard C Hoagland regularly reports that he saw NASA physically
altering transparencies of the original moon photos, airbrushing alien
structure proofs out.

In the same vein NASA ordered monitors showing Mars skies to be
adjusted to show it as yellow - they used the tint control.

Pop scifi film of the day: "Capricorn One".